Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence for de novo imprinted X-chromosome inactivation independent of meiotic inactivation in mice

Nature volume 438, pages 369–373 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

In mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated in females to enable dosage compensation for X-linked gene products1. In rodents and marsupials, only the X chromosome of paternal origin (Xp) is silenced during early embryogenesis. This could be due to a carry-over effect of the X chromosome's passage through the male germ line, where it becomes transiently silenced together with the Y chromosome, during meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI)2. Here we show that XIST (X inactive specific transcript) transgenes, located on autosomes, do not undergo MSCI in the male germ line of mice and yet can induce imprinted cis-inactivation when paternally inherited, with identical kinetics to the Xp chromosome. This suggests that MSCI is not necessary for imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice. We also show that the Xp is transcribed, like autosomes, at zygotic gene activation rather than being ‘pre-inactivated’3. We propose that expression of the paternal Xist gene at zygotic gene activation is sufficient to trigger cis-inactivation of the X chromosome, or of an autosome carrying a Xist transgene.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Imprinted X-inactivation and autosomal Xist transgenes.
Figure 2: Histone H3 modifications and Polycomb proteins in female embryos carrying paternally transmitted Tg53 Xist transgenes.
Figure 3: Early transcriptional activity followed by silencing during imprinted X inactivation.
Figure 4: Absence of XY body marks and meiotic inactivation of the Tg53 transgene on chromosome 13 in pachytene-stage spermatocytes from male Tg53 testes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lyon, M. F. Gene action in the X chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190, 372–373 (1961)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lifschytz, E. & Lindsley, D. L. The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis (Drosophila-allocycly-chromosome evolution-male sterility-dosage compensation). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 69, 182–186 (1972)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huynh, K. D. & Lee, J. T. Inheritance of a pre-inactivated paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Nature 426, 857–862 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X-chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse. Nature 256, 640–642 (1975)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mak, W. et al. Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Science 303, 666–669 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Okamoto, I., Otto, A. P., Allis, C. D., Reinberg, D. & Heard, E. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 303, 644–649 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, D. et al. X-inactivation in marsupials and monotremes. Semin. Dev. Biol. 4, 117–128 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Vandeberg, J. L., Robinson, E. S., Samollow, P. B. & Johnston, P. G. Isozymes: Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research 225–253 (Liss, New York, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lyon, M. F. & Rastan, S. Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance to X-chromosome inactivation. Differentiation 26, 63–67 (1984)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shao, C. & Takagi, N. An extra maternally derived X chromosome is deleterious to early mouse development. Development 110, 969–975 (1990)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tada, T. & Takagi, N. Parental imprinting on the mouse X chromosome: effects on the early development of X0, XXY and XXX embryos. Genet. Res. 62, 139–148 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tada, T. et al. Imprint switching for non-random X-chromosome inactivation during mouse oocyte growth. Development 127, 3101–3105 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heard, E. Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 247–255 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Monk, M. & McLaren, A. X-chromosome activity in foetal germ cells of the mouse. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 63, 75–84 (1981)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grant, S. G. & Chapman, V. M. Mechanisms of X-chromosome regulation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22, 199–233 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heard, E. et al. Transgenic mice carrying an Xist-containing YAC. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 441–450 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heard, E., Mongelard, F., Arnaud, D. & Avner, P. Xist yeast artificial chromosome transgenes function as X-inactivation centers only in multicopy arrays and not as single copies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3156–3166 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Penny, G. D., Kay, G. F., Sheardown, S. A., Rastan, S. & Brockdorff, N. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marahrens, Y., Panning, B., Dausman, J., Strauss, W. & Jaenisch, R. Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis. Genes Dev. 11, 156–166 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Simmler, M. C. et al. Localization and expression analysis of a novel conserved brain expressed transcript, Brx/BRX, lying within the Xic/XIC candidate region. Mamm. Genome 8, 760–766 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carrel, L., Hunt, P. A. & Willard, H. F. Tissue and lineage-specific variation in inactive X chromosome expression of the murine Smcx gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 1361–1366 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Carrel, L. et al. X inactivation analysis and DNA methylation studies of the ubiquitin activating enzyme E1 and PCTAIRE-1 genes in human and mouse. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 391–401 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lingenfelter, P. A. et al. Escape from X inactivation of Smcx is preceded by silencing during mouse development. Nature Genet. 18, 212–223 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Turner, J. et al. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nature Genet. 37, 41–47 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernandez-Capetillo, O. et al. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev. Cell 4, 497–513 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoyer-Fender, S., Costanzi, C. & Pehrson, J. R. Histone macroH2A1.2 is concentrated in the XY-body by the early pachytene stage of spermatogenesis. Exp. Cell Res. 258, 254–260 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Baart, E. B., de Rooij, D. G., Keegan, K. S. & de Boer, P. Distribution of Atr protein in primary spermatocytes of a mouse chromosomal mutant: a comparison of preparation techniques. Chromosoma 109, 139–147 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baarends, W. M. et al. Histone ubiquitination and chromatin remodeling in mouse spermatogenesis. Dev. Biol. 235, 322–333 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kay, G. F., Barton, S. C., Surani, M. A. & Rastan, S. Imprinting and X chromosome counting mechanisms determine Xist expression in early mouse development. Cell 77, 639–650 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Heard, E., Chaumeil, J., Masui, O. & Okamoto, I. Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation: An epigenetics paradigm. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 69, 89–102 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank G. Almouzni, P. A. Defossez and N. Takagi for critical reading of the manuscript; members of our group and V. Colot for discussions; D. Reinberg and D. Papadopoulou for gifts of antibodies; and M. Blanche for help with mice. I.O. was supported by the CNRS; E.H. and I.O. were financed by the CNRS (ATIP programme), the French Ministry of Research (Action Concertée Incitative), the Curie Institute (Program Incitatif et Collaboratif) and the EU Network of Excellence (Epigenome). P.A. was supported by contracts from ARC by the Ministry of Research under the ACI programme and the EU Network of Excellence (Epigenome).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNRS UMR218, Curie Institute, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Cedex 05, Paris, France

    Ikuhiro Okamoto, Patricia Le Baccon & Edith Heard

  2. Pasteur Institute, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015, Paris, France

    Danielle Arnaud & Philip Avner

  3. Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 406, 1098 SM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Arie P. Otte

  4. Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Washington, 98195, Seattle, USA

    Christine M. Disteche

Authors
  1. Ikuhiro Okamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle Arnaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia Le Baccon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arie P. Otte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christine M. Disteche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Philip Avner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Edith Heard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edith Heard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Data

Analysis of Xist expression patterns in blastocysts derived from transgenic males or females. (DOC 21 kb)

Supplementary Discussion

A possible explanation for the evolution of imprinted X inactivation in rodents is provided. (DOC 20 kb)

Supplementary Methods

Additional details of methods used in this study, which could not be mentioned in the main text. (DOC 25 kb)

Supplementary Figure Legends

Text to accompany the below Supplementary Figures (DOC 26 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

Paternally and maternally transmitted autosomal Xist YAC transgenes. (PDF 6056 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Additional marks of imprinted X inactivation on females embryos carrying paternally transmitted Tg53 Xist transgenes. (PDF 17739 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3

Transcriptional activity of the paternal X chromosome assayed by gene specific RNA FISH. (PDF 15342 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4

Transcriptional activity of the paternal X chromosome assayed by Cot-1 RNA FISH. (PDF 13679 kb)

Supplementary Figure 5

Chromatin marks associated with the XY body in pachytene stage spermatocytes do not affect the chromosome 13 pair in Tg53 testis. (PDF 9902 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6

Analysis of transgene induced cis-inactivation in embryos derived from homozygous males. (PDF 6222 kb)

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Table 1 details Xist expression patterns in pre-implantation embryos derived from WT females and YAC Tg53 males. Supplementary Table 2 details antibodies and dilutions used. (DOC 88 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okamoto, I., Arnaud, D., Le Baccon, P. et al. Evidence for de novo imprinted X-chromosome inactivation independent of meiotic inactivation in mice. Nature 438, 369–373 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04155

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing