Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 438, 212-215 (10 November 2005) | doi:10.1038/nature04214; Received 12 April 2005; Accepted 30 August 2005
There is a Brief Communications Arising (20 July 2006) associated with this document.
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
nature jobs
Senior Computational Scientist
- Argonne National Laboratory
- Argonne, IL, United States
Scientist / Sr. Scientist - Biopharmaceutics
- Syngene International
- Bangalore, Karnataka 560099 India
The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture
Erik L. Olson1 & Richard M. Allen2
- Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin Madison, 1215 W. Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, 307 McCone Hall, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Correspondence to: Richard M. Allen2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.M.A. (Email: rallen@berkeley.edu).
Abstract
Understanding the earthquake rupture process is central to our understanding of fault systems and earthquake hazards. Multiple hypotheses concerning the nature of fault rupture have been proposed but no unifying theory has emerged1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. The conceptual hypothesis most commonly cited is the cascade model for fault rupture1, 3, 10, 13. In the cascade model, slip initiates on a small fault patch and continues to rupture further across a fault plane as long as the conditions are favourable. Two fundamental implications of this domino-like theory are that small earthquakes begin in the same manner as large earthquakes and that the rupture process is not deterministic—that is, the size of the earthquake cannot be determined until the cessation of rupture. Here we show that the frequency content of radiated seismic energy within the first few seconds of rupture scales with the final magnitude of the event. We infer that the magnitude of an earthquake can therefore be estimated before the rupture is complete. This finding implies that the rupture process is to some degree deterministic and has implications for the physics of the rupture process.
- Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin Madison, 1215 W. Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, 307 McCone Hall, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Correspondence to: Richard M. Allen2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.M.A. (Email: rallen@berkeley.edu).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Tsunami-wave seismologyNature News and Views (31 Aug 1989)
Seismology The start of something big?Nature News and Views (10 Nov 2005)
See all 12 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
A great earthquake doublet and seismic stress transfer cycle in the central Kuril islandsNature Letters to Editor (31 Jan 2008)
Earthquake nucleation by transient deformations caused by the M = 7.9 Denali, Alaska, earthquakeNature Letters to Editor (12 Feb 2004)
See all 55 matches for Research
