Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Forgery

‘Fingerprinting’ documents and packaging

Unique surface imperfections serve as an easily identifiable feature in the fight against fraud.

Abstract

We have found that almost all paper documents, plastic cards and product packaging contain a unique physical identity code formed from microscopic imperfections in the surface. This covert ‘fingerprint’ is intrinsic and virtually impossible to modify controllably. It can be rapidly read using a low-cost portable laser scanner. Most forms of document and branded-product fraud could be rendered obsolete by use of this code.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparing document fingerprints.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith, J. R. & Sutherland, A. V. Proc. AutoID'99, Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies 79–83 (IEEE, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Renesse, R. in European Convention on Security and Detection 45–49 (Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Indeck, R. S. & Glavinas, E. IEEE Trans. Magn. 29, 4095–4097 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pappu, R., Recht, B., Taylor, J. & Gershenfeld, N. Science 297, 2026–2030 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodman, J. W. Topics in Applied Physics: Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena (ed. Dainty, J. C.) vol. 9 (Springer, Berlin, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leonard, L. C. & Toal, V. Opt. Lasers Eng. 30, 433–440 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sjodahl, M. & Larsson, L. Opt. Lasers Eng. 42, 193–201 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Seo, Y. B. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 25, 321–325 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Briers, J. D., Richards, G. & He, X. W. J. Biomed. Opt. 4, 164–175 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell P. Cowburn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

This work was funded by an external company, Ingenia Holdings. One or more of the authors have consultancy agreements with that company. Patents have been filed on the work described in the paper and an exploitation company registered. Some of the authors own small shareholdings in that company. The total share ownership of all the authors combined does not exceed 10%.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchanan, J., Cowburn, R., Jausovec, AV. et al. ‘Fingerprinting’ documents and packaging. Nature 436, 475 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/436475a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/436475a

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing