Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cattle movements and bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain

Abstract

For 20 years, bovine tuberculosis (BTB) has been spreading in Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland) and is now endemic in the southwest and parts of central England and in southwest Wales, and occurs sporadically elsewhere. Although its transmission pathways remain poorly understood, the disease's distribution was previously modelled statistically by using environmental variables and measures of their seasonality1. Movements of infected animals have long been considered a critical factor in the spread of livestock diseases, as reflected in strict import/export regulations, the extensive movement restrictions imposed during the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak2,3, the tracing procedures after a new case of BTB has been confirmed and the Government's recently published strategic framework for the sustainable control on BTB4. Since January 2001 it has been mandatory for stock-keepers in Great Britain to notify the British Cattle Movement Service of all cattle births, movements and deaths5. Here we show that movements as recorded in the Cattle Tracing System data archive, and particularly those from areas where BTB is reported, consistently outperform environmental, topographic and other anthropogenic variables as the main predictor of disease occurrence. Simulation distribution models for 2002 and 2003, incorporating all predictor categories, are presented and used to project distributions for 2004 and 2005.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Distribution and spread of BTB in 1985–2003 and distribution of annual cattle movements.
Figure 2: Modelled BTB distributions and projections.
Figure 3: Observed and predicted distributions of BTB.

References

  1. Wint, G. R. et al. Mapping bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain using environmental data. Trends Microbiol. 10, 441–444 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibbens, J. C. et al. Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: The first five months. Vet. Rec. 149, 729–743 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haydon, D. T. et al. The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot-and-mouth disease outbreak. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 121–127 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. DEFRA. Government Strategic Framework for the Sustainable Control of Bovine Truberculosis (bTB) in Great Britain March (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. NAO. Identifying and Tracking Livestock in England (Stationery Office, on behalf of National Audit Office, London, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bourne, F. J. et al. An Epidemiological Investigation into Bovine Tuberculosis—Towards a Sustainable Policy to Control TB in Cattle (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krebs, J. et al. Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle and Badgers (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Publications, London, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donnelly, C. A. et al. Impact of localized badger culling on tuberculosis incidence in British cattle. Nature 426, 834–837 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hay, S. I. & Lennon, J. J. Deriving meteorological variables across Africa for the study and control of vector-borne disease: a comparison of remote sensing and spatial interpolation of climate. Trop. Med. Int. Health 4, 58–71 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hay, S. I., Randolph, S. E. & Rogers, D. J. (eds) Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems in Epidemiology (Advances in Parasitology Vol. 47) (Academic, London, 2000)

  11. Hengeveld, R. Dynamics of Biological Invasions (Chapman & Hall, London, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shigesada, N. & Kawasaki, K. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practices (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbert, M., Grégoire, J.-C., Freise, J. & Heitland, W. Long-distance dispersal and human population density allow the prediction of invasive patterns in the horse-chestnut leafminer Cameraria ohridella. J. Anim. Ecol. 73, 459–468 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell, A. et al. Characteristics of cattle movements in Britain—an analysis of records from the Cattle Tracing Scheme. J. Anim. Sci. 80, 265–273 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Congalton, R. G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 37, 35–46 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, D. L., Lucey, B., Waller, L. A., Childs, J. E. & Real, L. A. Predicting the spatial dynamics of rabies epidemics on heterogeneous landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3668–3672 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Russell, C. A., Smith, D. L., Waller, L. A., Childs, J. E. & Real, L. A. A priori prediction of disease invasion dynamics in a novel environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 21–25 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Cox for comments on an early draft of the paper; D. Rogers and his TALA Research Group at Oxford for advice and for providing satellite imagery; and P. Roeder for help and encouragement. This work was funded by a DEFRA research project.Author Contributions M.G. did the simulation modelling and spatial statistics. W.W. did the data management, analysis and regression modelling. A.M. and J.M. did the movement data acquisition, processing and analysis. D.B. and R.C.-H. did the interpretation, editing and project management. A.M., J.M. and R.C.-H. are Civil Servants and as such their work is subject to Crown Copyright.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Wint.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Data, Supplementary Methods, four Supplementary Video legends, three Supplementary Figures, six Supplementary Tables and Supplementary Discussion. (PDF 642 kb)

Supplementary Video S1

Distributions of number of BTB detected cases per 5 km cell between 1984 and 2003. (AVI 1980 kb)

Supplementary Video S2

Distribution of monthly cattle movements for 2001 (AVI 1980 kb)

Supplementary Video S3

Distribution of monthly cattle movements for 2002 (AVI 654 kb)

Supplementary Video S4

Distribution of core area 1987-2003 (AVI 768 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, M., Mitchell, A., Bourn, D. et al. Cattle movements and bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain. Nature 435, 491–496 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03548

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03548

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing