Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Abrupt rise in atmospheric CO2 overestimates community response in a model plant–soil system

Nature volume 433, pages 621–624 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

Attempts to understand the ecological effect of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration, [CO2], usually involve exposing today's ecosystems to expected future [CO2] levels1,2. However, a major assumption of these approaches has not been tested—that exposing ecosystems to a single-step increase in [CO2] will yield similar responses to those of a gradual increase over several decades3. We tested this assumption on a mycorrhizal fungal community over a period of six years. [CO2] was either increased abruptly, as is typical of most [CO2] experiments, or more gradually over 21 generations. The two approaches resulted in different structural and functional community responses to increased [CO2]. Some fungi were sensitive to the carbon pulse of the abrupt [CO2] treatment. This resulted in an immediate decline in fungal species richness and a significant change in mycorrhizal functioning. The magnitude of changes in fungal diversity and functioning in response to gradually increasing [CO2] was smaller, and not significantly different to those with ambient [CO2]. Our results suggest that studies may overestimate some community responses to increasing [CO2] because biota may be sensitive to ecosystem changes that occur as a result of abrupt increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The effect of atmospheric [CO2] on AMF species richness.
Figure 2: The effect of atmospheric [CO2] on mycorrhizal dependency of B. inermis.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Körner, C. & Bazzaz, F. A. Carbon Dioxide, Populations, and Communities (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luo, Y. & Mooney, H. A. Carbon Dioxide and Environmental Stress (Academic Press, San Diego, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luo, Y. & Reynolds, J. F. Validity of extrapolating field CO2 experiments to predict carbon sequestration in natural ecosystems. Ecology 80, 1568–1583 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. IPCC. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. in A Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Watson, R. T. & the core writing team) 1–398 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bazzaz, F. A. The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 167–196 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward, J. K. & Kelly, J. K. Scaling up evolutionary responses to elevated CO2: lessons from Arabidopsis . Ecol. Lett. 7, 427–440 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinead, C. & Bell, G. Phenotypic consequences of 1,000 generations of selection at elevated CO2 in a green alga. Nature 431, 566–569(2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rillig, M. C., Treseder, K. K. & Allen, M. F. in Mycorrhizal Ecology (eds van der Heijden, M. G. A. & Sanders, I.) 135–160 (Springer, Berlin, 2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Treseder, K. K. A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. New Phytol. 164, 347–355 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Staddon, P. L. & Fitter, A. H. Does elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide affect arbuscular mycorrhizas? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 455–458 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Allen, M. F. Ecology of Mycorrhizae (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, S. E. & Read, D. J. Mycorrhizal Symbioses 2nd edn (Academic, London, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., Rillig, M. & Allen, M. F. Inter-specific differences in the response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to Artemisia tridentata grown under elevated atmospheric CO2 . New Phytol. 138, 599–605 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Treseder, K. K., Egerton-Warburton, L. M., Allen, M. F., Cheng, Y. & Oechel, W. C. Alteration of soil carbon pools and communities of mycorrhizal fungi in chaparral exposed to elevated carbon dioxide. Ecosystems 6, 786–796 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolf, J., Johnson, N. C., Rowland, D. L. & Reich, P. B. Elevated CO2 and plant species richness impact arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore communities. New Phytol. 157, 579–588 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klironomos, J. N. Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84, 2292–2301 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klironomos, J. N. in Microbial Biosystems: New Frontiers (eds Bell, C. R., Brylinsky, M. & Johnson-Green, P.). 845–851 (Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Microbial Ecology, Halifax, 2000).

  18. Hart, M. M. & Reader, R. J. Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 153, 335–344 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rillig, M. C., Wright, S. F., Allen, M. F. & Field, C. B. Rise in carbon dioxide changes soil structure. Nature 400, 628 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Piotrowski, J. S., Denich, T., Klironomos, J. N., Graham, J. M. & Rillig, M. C. The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizae on soil aggregation depend on the interaction between plant and fungal species. New Phytol. 164, 365–373 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Heijden, M. G. A. et al. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396, 69–72 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goverde, M., Van der Heijden, M. G. A., Wiemken, A., Sanders, I. R. & Erhardt, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence life history traits of a lepidopteran herbivore. Oecologia 125, 362–369 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gange, A. C., Brown, V. K. & Alphin, D. M. Multitrophic links between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and insect parasitoids. Ecol. Lett. 6, 1051–1055 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rillig, M. C. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and ecosystem processes. Ecol. Lett. 7, 740–754 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brundrett, M. C., Piché, Y. & Peterson, R. L. A new method for observing the morphology of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Can. J. Bot. 62, 2128–2134 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McGonigle, T. P., Miller, M. H., Evans, D. G., Fairchild, G. L. & Swan, J. A. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 115, 495–501 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller, R. M., Reinhardt, D. R. & Jastrow, J. D. External hyphal production of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in pasture and tallgrass prairie communities. Oecologia 103, 17–23 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kemper, W. D. & Rosenau, R. C. in Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods 2nd edn (ed. Klute, A.) 425 (Agronomy Monograph No. 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Crouch, T. Denich, P. Jermaine, P. John, B. Kerin, G. Lefebre, J. McCune, P. Moutoglis, J. Neville, V. Ortega, Y. Sipos-Randor, F. Steele, V. Turner, D. Wollad, E. Young and V. Yu for technical assistance. Financial support for this project was provided by a grant to J.N.K. by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, to M.F.A. by the US Department of Energy, and to M.C.R. by the US National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada

    John N. Klironomos, Shokouh Makvandi-Nejad, Benjamin E. Wolfe & Jeff R. Powell

  2. Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside, California, 92521, USA

    Michael F. Allen

  3. Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812, USA

    Matthias C. Rillig & Jeff Piotrowski

Authors
  1. John N. Klironomos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael F. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthias C. Rillig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeff Piotrowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shokouh Makvandi-Nejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Benjamin E. Wolfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jeff R. Powell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John N. Klironomos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klironomos, J., Allen, M., Rillig, M. et al. Abrupt rise in atmospheric CO2 overestimates community response in a model plant–soil system. Nature 433, 621–624 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03268

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03268

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing