Access

News and Views

Nature 433, 205-207 (20 January 2005) | doi:10.1038/433205a; Published online 19 January 2005

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Evolution:  A taste for mimicry

Graeme D. Ruxton1 & Michael P. Speed2

Top

Looking inedible is a great way to deter predators, but the warning signs must be learnt first. It seems that unpalatable species employ some unexpected strategies to make the education a quick one.

Darwin saw mimicry — strong visual resemblances between unrelated species — as an excellent test case for his theories of natural selection1. The phenomenon continues to exercise evolutionary biologists today, with the latest salvo coming from Skelhorn and Rowe2.

  1. Graeme D. Ruxton is at the Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
    e-mail: Email: g.ruxton@bio.gla.ac.uk
  2. Michael P. Speed is in the School of Biological Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Mimicry Sheep in wolves' clothing

Nature News and Views (27 Aug 1998)

Evolutionary biology Mimicry on the edge

Nature News and Views (05 Jul 2007)

See all 3 matches for News And Views

RESEARCH

Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences

Nature Letters to Editor (05 Jul 2007)

Is the viceroy a batesian mimic?

Nature Scientific Correspondence (20 Jun 1991)

The viceroy butterfly is not a batesian mimic

Nature Letters to Editor (11 Apr 1991)

See all 5 matches for Research