Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 432, 949 (23 December 2004) | doi:10.1038/432949c; Published online 22 December 2004
Meyer publication worse than just bad science
Day B. Ligon1 & Matthew B. Lovern1
- Department of Zoology, Oklahoma State University, 430 Life Sciences West, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074, USA
Vladimir Svetlov makes some interesting points, in Correspondence, about the proliferation of peer-reviewed journals and the publication of flawed papers (Nature 431, 897; 2004doi:10.1038/431897a).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
The real dirty secret of academic publishingNature Correspondence (21 Oct 2004)
Meyer paper: don't hang the Soc. Wash. out to dryNature Correspondence (23 Dec 2004)