Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 432, 97-100 (4 November 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02950; Received 2 July 2004; Accepted 18 August 2004
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
nature jobs
Documentation Specialist Needed For Cutting-Edge Pharma In Cambridge, Ma
- KSR
- Boston, MA, USA
Gastroenterologist
- Gundersen Lutheran Health System
- La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
Ecosystem remodelling among vertebrates at the Permian–Triassic boundary in Russia
M. J. Benton1, V. P. Tverdokhlebov2 & M. V. Surkov2
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK
- Geological Institute of Saratov State University, Ulitsa Moskovskaya 161, Saratov 410075, Russia
Correspondence to: M. J. Benton1 Email: mike.benton@bris.ac.uk
Abstract
The mass extinction at the Permian–Triassic boundary, 251 million years (Myr) ago, is accepted as the most profound loss of life on record1, 2, 3. Global data compilations indicate a loss of 50% of families or more, both in the sea1, 2, 4 and on land2, 5, and these figures scale to a loss of 80–96% of species, based on rarefaction analyses6, 7. This level of loss is confirmed by local and regional-scale studies of marine sections3, 8, but the terrestrial record has been harder to analyse in such close detail. Here we document the nature of the event in Russia in a comprehensive survey of 675 specimens of amphibians and reptiles from 289 localities spanning 13 successive geological time zones in the South Urals basin. These changes in diversity and turnover cannot be explained simply by sampling effects. There was a profound loss of genera and families, and simplification of ecosystems, with the loss of small fish-eaters and insect-eaters, medium and large herbivores and large carnivores. Faunal dynamics also changed, from high rates of turnover through the Late Permian period to greater stability at low diversity through the Early Triassic period. Even after 15 Myr of ecosystem rebuilding, some guilds were apparently still absent—small fish-eaters, small insect-eaters, large herbivores and top carnivores.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Ecosystem remodelling among vertebrates at the Permian?Triassic boundary in RussiaNature Letters to Editor (04 Nov 2004)

