Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Chicken genomics

Feather-pecking and victim pigmentation

A genetic factor that encourages this form of farmyard bullying has been identified.

Abstract

Feather-pecking in domestic birds is associated with cannibalism and severe welfare problems1. It is a dramatic example of a spiteful behaviour in which the victim's fitness is reduced for no immediate direct benefit to the perpetrator2 and its evolution is unexplained. Here we show that the plumage pigmentation of a chicken may predispose it to become a victim: birds suffer more drastic feather-pecking when the colour of their plumage is due to the expression of a wild recessive allele at PMEL17, a gene that controls plumage melanization3, and when these birds are relatively common in a flock. These findings, obtained using an intercross between a domestic fowl and its wild ancestor, have implications for the welfare of domestic species and offer insight into the genetic changes associated with the evolution of feather-pecking during the early stages of domestication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Chicken vulnerability to feather-pecking.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blokhuis, H. J. & Wiepkema, P. R. Vet. Quart. 20, 6–9 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnstone, R. A. & Bshary, R. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 1917–1922 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerje, S. et al. Genetics (in the press).

  4. Smyth, J. R. in Poultry Breeding and Genetics (ed. Crawford, R. D.) 109–167 (Elsevier Science, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. McAdie, T. M. & Keeling, L. J. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75, 147–159 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Savory, C. J. & Mann, J. S. Brit. Poult. Sci. 40, 565–572 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen, P. et al. ISAE 2003 Meeting, June 24–28, 68 (2003).

  8. Kjaer, J. B. & Sørensen, P. Brit. Poult. Sci. 38, 333–341 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buithenhuis, A. J. et al. Poult. Sci. 82, 1661–1667 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buithenhuis, A. J. et al. Poult. Sci. 82, 1215–1222 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Jensen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keeling, L., Andersson, L., Schütz, K. et al. Feather-pecking and victim pigmentation. Nature 431, 645–646 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/431645a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/431645a

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing