Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The role of RNA interference in heterochromatic silencing

Abstract

Soon after its discovery 75 years ago, heterochromatin, a dense chromosomal material, was found to silence genes. But its importance in regulating gene expression was controversial. Long thought to be inert, heterochromatin is now known to give rise to small RNAs, which, by means of RNA interference, direct the modification of proteins and DNA in heterochromatic repeats and transposable elements. Heterochromatin has thus emerged as a key factor in epigenetic regulation of gene expression, chromosome behaviour and evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Heterochromatin, transposable elements and PEV.
Figure 2: RNAi and heterochromatic silencing.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heitz, E. Das heterochromatin der Moose. Jehrb. Wiss. Botanik 69, 762–818 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hennig, W. Heterochromatin. Chromosoma 108, 1–9 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller, H. J. Types of visible variations induced by X-rays in Drosophila. J. Genetics 22, 299–334 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Comfort, N. C. From controlling elements to transposons: Barbara McClintock and the Nobel Prize. Trends Genet. 17, 475–478 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenuwein, T. & Allis, C. D. Translating the histone code. Science 293, 1074–1080 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lachner, M. & Jenuwein, T. The many faces of histone lysine methylation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 286–298 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brehm, A., Tufteland, K. R., Aasland, R. & Becker, P. B. The many colours of chromodomains. Bioessays 26, 133–140 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaenisch, R. & Bird, A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature Genet. 33 (Suppl.), 245–254 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamaru, H. & Selker, E. U. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa. Nature 414, 277–283 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindroth, A. M. et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science 292, 2077–2080 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartee, L., Malagnac, F. & Bender, J. Arabidopsis cmt3 chromomethylase mutations block non-CG methylation and silencing of an endogenous gene. Genes Dev. 15, 1753–1758 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson, J. P., Lindroth, A. M., Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature 416, 556–560 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Malagnac, F., Bartee, L. & Bender, J. An Arabidopsis SET domain protein required for maintenance but not establishment of DNA methylation. EMBO J. 21, 6842–6852 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tariq, M. et al. Erasure of CpG methylation in Arabidopsis alters patterns of histone H3 methylation in heterochromatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8823–8827 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lippman, Z., May, B., Yordan, C., Singer, T. & Martienssen, R. Distinct mechanisms determine transposon inheritance and methylation via small interfering RNA and histone modification. PLoS Biol. 1, E67 (2003).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, L., Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. Interplay between two epigenetic marks. DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Curr. Biol. 12, 1360–1367 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuks, F., Hurd, P. J., Deplus, R. & Kouzarides, T. The DNA methyltransferases associate with HP1 and the SUV39H1 histone methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 2305–2312 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuks, F. et al. The methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 links DNA methylation to histone methylation. J Biol. Chem. 278, 4035–4040 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehnertz, B. et al. Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr. Biol. 13, 1192–1200 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, C. T. et al. Histone H3-lysine 9 methylation is associated with aberrant gene silencing in cancer cells and is rapidly reversed by 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Cancer Res. 62, 6456–6461 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeddeloh, J. A., Stokes, T. L. & Richards, E. J. Maintenance of genomic methylation requires a SWI2/SNF2-like protein. Nature Genet. 22, 94–97 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gendrel, A. V., Lippman, Z., Yordan, C., Colot, V. & Martienssen, R. A. Dependence of heterochromatic histone H3 methylation patterns on the Arabidopsis gene DDM1. Science 297, 1871–1873 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vongs, A., Kakutani, T., Martienssen, R. A. & Richards, E. J. Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation mutants. Science 260, 1926–1928 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kankel, M. W. et al. Arabidopsis MET1 cytosine methyltransferase mutants. Genetics 163, 1109–1122 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Martienssen, R. A. & Colot, V. DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance in plants and filamentous fungi. Science 293, 1070–1074 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lippman, Z. L. et al. Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control. Nature 430, 471–476 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kato, M., Miura, A., Bender, J., Jacobsen, S. E. & Kakutani, T. Role of CG and non-CG methylation in immobilization of transposons in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 13, 421–426 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Matzke, M. et al. Genetic analysis of RNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1677, 129–141 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grewal, S. I. Transcriptional silencing in fission yeast. J. Cell Physiol. 184, 311–318 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Volpe, T. A. et al. Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science 297, 1833–1837 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Reinhart, B. J. & Bartel, D. P. Small RNAs correspond to centromere heterochromatic repeats. Science 297, 1831 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernard, P. et al. Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science 294, 2539–2542 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Volpe, T. et al. RNA interference is required for normal centromere function in fission yeast. Chromosome Res. 11, 137–146 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hall, I. M., Noma, K. & Grewal, S. I. RNA interference machinery regulates chromosome dynamics during mitosis and meiosis in fission yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 193–198 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Verdel, A. et al. RNAi-mediated targeting of heterochromatin by the RITS complex. Science 303, 672–676 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Martienssen, R. A. Maintenance of heterochromatin by RNA interference of tandem repeats. Nature Genet. 35, 213–214 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jacobs, S. A. & Khorasanizadeh, S. Structure of HP1 chromodomain bound to a lysine 9-methylated histone H3 tail. Science 295, 2080–2083 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schramke, V. & Allshire, R. Hairpin RNAs and retrotransposon LTRs affect RNAi and chromatin-based gene silencing. Science 301, 1069–1074 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hall, I. M. et al. Establishment and maintenance of a heterochromatin domain. Science 297, 2232–2237 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jia, S., Noma, K. & Grewal, S. I. RNAi-independent heterochromatin nucleation by the stress-activated ATF/CREB family proteins. Science 304, 1971–1976 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dernburg, A. F., Zalevsky, J., Colaiacovo, M. P. & Villeneuve, A. M. Transgene-mediated cosuppression in the C. elegans germ line. Genes Dev. 14, 1578–1583 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu-Scharf, D., Jeong, B., Zhang, C. & Cerutti, H. Transgene and transposon silencing in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by a DEAH-box RNA helicase. Science 290, 1159–1162 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Aravin, A. A. et al. Double-stranded RNA-mediated silencing of genomic tandem repeats and transposable elements in the D. melanogaster germline. Curr. Biol. 11, 1017–1027 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Aravin, A. A. et al. The small RNA profile during Drosophila melanogaster development. Dev. Cell 5, 337–350 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Djikeng, A., Shi, H., Tschudi, C. & Ullu, E. RNA interference in Trypanosoma brucei: cloning of small interfering RNAs provides evidence for retrotransposon-derived 24-26-nucleotide RNAs. RNA 7, 1522–1530 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mochizuki, K., Fine, N., Fujisawa, T. & Gorovsky, M. Analysis of a piwi-related gene implicates small RNAs in genome rearrangement in Tetrahymena. Cell 110, 689 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Taverna, S. D., Coyne, R. S. & Allis, C. D. Methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 targets programmed DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Cell 110, 701–711 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Xie, Z. et al. Genetic and functional diversification of small RNA pathways in plants. PLoS Biol. 2, E104 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Sijen, T. & Plasterk, R. H. Transposon silencing in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line by natural RNAi. Nature 426, 310–314 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zilberman, D., Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. E. ARGONAUTE4 control of locus-specific siRNA accumulation and DNA and histone methylation. Science 299, 716–719 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lynn, K. et al. The PINHEAD/ZWILLE gene acts pleiotropically in Arabidopsis development and has overlapping functions with the ARGONAUTE1 gene. Development 126, 469–481 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Soppe, W. J. et al. The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. Mol. Cell 6, 791–802 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kinoshita, T. et al. One-way control of FWA imprinting in Arabidopsis endosperm by DNA methylation. Science 303, 521–523 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chan, S. W. et al. RNA silencing genes control de novo DNA methylation. Science 303, 1336 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. E. Role of the Arabidopsis DRM methyltransferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing. Curr. Biol. 12, 1138–1144 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cao, X. et al. Role of the DRM and CMT3 methyltransferases in RNA-directed DNA methylation. Curr. Biol. 13, 2212–2217 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bender, J. & Fink, G. R. Epigenetic control of an endogenous gene family is revealed by a novel blue fluorescent mutant of Arabidopsis. Cell 83, 725–734 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mette, M. F., Aufsatz, W., van der Winden, J., Matzke, M. A. & Matzke, A. J. Transcriptional silencing and promoter methylation triggered by double-stranded RNA. EMBO J. 19, 5194–5201 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Melquist, S. & Bender, J. Transcription from an upstream promoter controls methylation signaling from an inverted repeat of endogenous genes in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 17, 2036–2047 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Zilberman, D. et al. Role of Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE4 in RNA-directed DNA methylation triggered by inverted repeats. Curr. Biol. 14, 1214–1220 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fagard, M., Boutet, S., Morel, J. B., Bellini, C. & Vaucheret, H. AGO1, QDE-2, and RDE-1 are related proteins required for post-transcriptional gene silencing in plants, quelling in fungi, and RNA interference in animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11650–11654 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Pal-Bhadra, M. et al. Heterochromatic silencing and HP1 localization in Drosophila are dependent on the RNAi machinery. Science 303, 669–672 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pal-Bhadra, M., Bhadra, U. & Birchler, J. A. RNAi related mechanisms affect both transcriptional and posttranscriptional transgene silencing in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 9, 315–327 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lee, Y. S. et al. Distinct roles for Drosophila Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 in the siRNA/miRNA silencing pathways. Cell 117, 69–81 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kelly, W. G. et al. X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development 129, 479–492 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Maison, C. et al. Higher-order structure in pericentric heterochromatin involves a distinct pattern of histone modification and an RNA component. Nature Genet. 30, 329–334 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Bernstein, E. et al. Dicer is essential for mouse development. Nature Genet. 35, 215–217 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Rudert, F., Bronner, S., Garnier, J. M. & Dolle, P. Transcripts from opposite strands of gamma satellite DNA are differentially expressed during mouse development. Mamm. Genome 6, 76–83 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Deng, W. & Lin, H. miwi a murine homolog of piwi, encodes a cytoplasmic protein essential for spermatogenesis. Dev. Cell 2, 819–830 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S. et al. Mili a mammalian member of piwi family gene, is essential for spermatogenesis. Development 131, 839–849 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kelley, R. L. & Kuroda, M. I. Noncoding RNA genes in dosage compensation and imprinting. Cell 103, 9–12 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Reik, W. & Walter, J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 21–32 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kiyosue, T. et al. Control of fertilization-independent endosperm development by the MEDEA polycomb gene in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4186–4191 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Baroux, C., Spillane, C. & Grossniklaus, U. Genomic imprinting during seed development. Adv. Genet. 46, 165–214 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sleutels, F. & Barlow, D. P. The origins of genomic imprinting in mammals. Adv. Genet. 46, 119–163 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Seitz, H. et al. Imprinted microRNA genes transcribed antisense to a reciprocally imprinted retrotransposon-like gene. Nature Genet. 34, 261–262 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Stam, M., Belele, C., Dorweiler, J. E. & Chandler, V. L. Differential chromatin structure within a tandem array 100 kb upstream of the maize b1 locus is associated with paramutation. Genes Dev. 16, 1906–1918 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Avner, P. & Heard, E. X-chromosome inactivation: counting, choice and initiation. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 59–67 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Heard, E. et al. Methylation of histone H3 at Lys-9 is an early mark on the X chromosome during X inactivation. Cell 107, 727–738 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Akhtar, A., Zink, D. & Becker, P. B. Chromodomains are protein-RNA interaction modules. Nature 407, 405–409 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Merok, J. R., Lansita, J. A., Tunstead, J. R. & Sherley, J. L. Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics. Cancer Res. 62, 6791–6795 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. McClintock, B. Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 16, 13–47 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. McClintock, B., Kato Y., T. A. & Blumenschein, A. Chromosome Constitutions of Races of Maize. Their Significance for Interpreting Relationships Among Races and Strains in the Americas (A monograph.) (Colegio de Postgraduados, Escuela National de Agricultura, Chapingo, Edo. Mexico, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Fransz, P., Soppe, W. & Schubert, I. Heterochromatin in interphase nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosome Res. 11, 227–240 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Osborn, T. C. et al. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends Genet. 19, 141–147 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Heath, E. M. & Simmons, M. J. Genetic and molecular analysis of repression in the P-M system of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 57, 213–226 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Sarot, E., Payen-Groschene, G., Bucheton, A. & Pelisson, A. Evidence for a piwi-dependent RNA silencing of the gypsy endogenous retrovirus by the Drosophila melanogaster flamenco gene. Genetics 166, 1313–1321 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Sun, X., Le, H. D., Wahlstrom, J. M. & Karpen, G. H. Sequence analysis of a functional Drosophila centromere. Genome Res. 13, 182–194 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815 (2000).

  90. Choo, K. H. Domain organization at the centromere and neocentromere. Dev. Cell 1, 165–177 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Ananiev, E. V., Phillips, R. L. & Rines, H. W. Complex structure of knobs and centromeric regions in maize chromosomes. Tsitol. Genet. 34, 11–15 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Nagaki, K. et al. Sequencing of a rice centromere uncovers active genes. Nature Genet. 36, 138–145 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Selker, E. U. et al. The methylated component of the Neurospora crassa genome. Nature 422, 893–897 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Jorgensen, R. A. in RNAi: A Guide to Gene Silencing (ed. Hannon, G. J.) Ch. 1, 5–21 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kouzminova, E. & Selker, E. U. dim-2 encodes a DNA methyltransferase responsible for all known cytosine methylation in Neurospora. EMBO J. 20, 4309–4323 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Xiao, W. et al. Imprinting of the MEA Polycomb gene is controlled by antagonism between MET1 methyltransferase and DME glycosylase. Dev. Cell 5, 891–901 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Colot, V., Maloisel, L. & Rossignol, J. L. Interchromosomal transfer of epigenetic states in Ascobolus: transfer of DNA methylation is mechanistically related to homologous recombination. Cell 86, 855–864 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Shiu, P. K. & Metzenberg, R. L. Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA: properties, regulation and suppression. Genetics 161, 1483–1495 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Freitag, M. et al. DNA methylation is independent of RNA interference in Neurospora. Science 304, 1939 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Wassenegger, M., Heimes, S., Riedel, L. & Sanger, H. L. RNA-directed de novo methylation of genomic sequences in plants. Cell 76, 567–576 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our collaborators V. Colot and A.-V. Gendrel, and members of our laboratory for discussions. We thank J. Birchler and S. Elgin for permission to reproduce Fig. 1, and A. Frary for comments on the manuscript. Z.L. is the recipient of an Arnold and Mabel Beckman Graduate Student Fellowship of the Watson School of Biological Sciences. R.M is supported by an NSF Plant Genome Program grant and an NIH grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lippman, Z., Martienssen, R. The role of RNA interference in heterochromatic silencing. Nature 431, 364–370 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02875

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02875

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing