Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 430, 453-456 (22 July 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02634; Received 4 March 2004; Accepted 4 May 2004
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
nature jobs
Outstanding Tenure-Track Group Leaders
- ICFO - The Institute of Photonic Sciences
- Barcelona (SPAIN)
Assistant / Associate / Full Professor
- Northeastern University
- Boston, MA
Conceptual precursors to language
Susan J. Hespos1 & Elizabeth S. Spelke2
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
Correspondence to: Susan J. Hespos1 Email: s.hespos@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
Because human languages vary in sound and meaning, children must learn which distinctions their language uses. For speech perception, this learning is selective: initially infants are sensitive to most acoustic distinctions used in any language1, 2, 3, and this sensitivity reflects basic properties of the auditory system rather than mechanisms specific to language4, 5, 6, 7; however, infants' sensitivity to non-native sound distinctions declines over the course of the first year8. Here we ask whether a similar process governs learning of word meanings. We investigated the sensitivity of 5-month-old infants in an English-speaking environment to a conceptual distinction that is marked in Korean but not English; that is, the distinction between 'tight' and 'loose' fit of one object to another9, 10. Like adult Korean speakers but unlike adult English speakers, these infants detected this distinction and divided a continuum of motion-into-contact actions into tight- and loose-fit categories. Infants' sensitivity to this distinction is linked to representations of object mechanics11 that are shared by non-human animals12, 13, 14. Language learning therefore seems to develop by linking linguistic forms to universal, pre-existing representations of sound and meaning.
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
Correspondence to: Susan J. Hespos1 Email: s.hespos@vanderbilt.edu
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Language Children think before they speakNature News and Views (22 Jul 2004)
Sounds and signalsNature News and Views (02 Dec 1976)
See all 5 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Language recovery following isolation for severe combined immunodeficiency diseaseNature Letters to Editor (03 Nov 1983)
See all 12 matches for Research
