Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Positive selection at sites of multiple amino acid replacements since rat–mouse divergence

Abstract

New alleles become fixed owing to random drift of nearly neutral mutations or to positive selection of substantially advantageous mutations1,2,3. After decades of debate, the fraction of fixations driven by selection remains uncertain4,5,6,7,8,9. Within 9,390 genes, we analysed 28,196 codons at which rat and mouse differ from each other at two nucleotide sites and 1,982 codons with three differences. At codons where rat–mouse divergence involved two non-synonymous substitutions, both of them occurred in the same lineage, either rat or mouse, in 64% of cases; however, independent substitutions would occur in the same lineage with a probability of only 50%. All three non-synonymous substitutions occurred in the same lineage for 46% of codons, instead of the 25% expected. Furthermore, comparison of 12 pairs of prokaryotic genomes also shows clumping of multiple non-synonymous substitutions in the same lineage. This pattern cannot be explained by correlated mutation or episodes of relaxed negative selection, but instead indicates that positive selection acts at many sites of rapid, successive amino acid replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Gillespie, J. H. The Causes of Molecular Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ohta, T. Near-neutrality in evolution of genes and gene regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16134–16137 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, N. G. C. & Eyre-Walker, A. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature 415, 1022–1024 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fay, J. C., Wyckoff, G. J. & Wu, C.-I. Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila. Nature 415, 1024–1026 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bustamante, C. D. et al. The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis. Nature 416, 531–534 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eyre-Walker, A. Changing effective population size and the McDonald-Kreitman test. Genetics 162, 2017–2024 (2002)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, Z. H. Inference of selection from multiple species alignments. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 688–694 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anisimova, M., Nielsen, R. & Yang, Z. H. Effect of recombination on the accuracy of the likelihood method for detecting positive selection at amino acid sites. Genetics 164, 1229–1236 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Makalowski, W. & Boguski, M. S. Evolutionary parameters of the transcribed mammalian genome: an analysis of 2,820 orthologous rodent and human sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9407–9412 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondrashov, A. S. Direct estimates of human per nucleotide mutation rates at 20 loci causing Mendelian diseases. Hum. Mutat. 21, 12–27 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nachman, M. W. & Crowell, S. L. Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genetics 156, 297–304 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fitch, W. M. & Markowitz, E. An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem. Genet. 4, 579–593 (1970)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huelsenbeck, J. P. Testing a covariotide model of DNA substitution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 698–707 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyata, T., Miyazawa, S. & Yasunaga, T. Two types of amino acid substitutions in protein evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 12, 219–236 (1979)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bustamante, C. D., Nielsen, R. & Hartl, D. L. A maximum likelihood method for analyzing pseudogene evolution: implications for silent site evolution in humans and rodents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 110–127 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hellman, I. et al. Selection on human genes as revealed by comparisons to chimpanzee cDNA. Genome Res. 13, 831–837 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilbur, W. J. On the PAM matrix model of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2, 434–447 (1985)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420, 520–562 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rat Genome Sequencing Project Consortium. Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 428, 493–521 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tatusov, R. L., Koonin, E. V. & Lipman, D. J. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278, 631–637 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680 (1994)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, Z. H. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 555–556 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank N. Bierne for a number of suggestions. G.A.B. was supported by a BWF graduate fellowship. S.S. was supported by Genome Canada Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgii A. Bazykin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures and Discussion

Analysis of substitutions at adjacent codons, of possible biased misidentification of the rat-mouse common ancestor, and of fluctuating negative selection.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazykin, G., Kondrashov, F., Ogurtsov, A. et al. Positive selection at sites of multiple amino acid replacements since rat–mouse divergence. Nature 429, 558–562 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02601

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing