Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 429, 284-288 (20 May 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02557; Received 24 October 2003; Accepted 7 April 2004
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Optimizing Sub-cellular Localization Tags
The Seeker is looking for methods to optimize sub-cellular localization tags for protein expression....
nature jobs
Basic Science Medical Educators
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
- El Paso, Texas, USA
Faculty Positions
- Wayne State University
- Detroit MI United States
Analysing the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes with recent instrumentally recorded aftershocks
Karl Mueller1, Susan E. Hough2 & Roger Bilham1,3
- Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399, USA
- US Geological Survey, 525 South Wilson Ave, Pasadena, California 91030, USA
- CIRES University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0216, USA
Correspondence to: Karl Mueller1 Email: Karl.Mueller@colorado.edu
Abstract
Although dynamic stress changes associated with the passage of seismic waves are thought to trigger earthquakes at great distances, more than 60 per cent of all aftershocks appear to be triggered by static stress changes within two rupture lengths of a mainshock1, 2, 3, 4, 5. The observed distribution of aftershocks may thus be used to infer details of mainshock rupture geometry6. Aftershocks following large mid-continental earthquakes, where background stressing rates are low, are known to persist for centuries7, 8, and models based on rate-and-state friction laws provide theoretical support for this inference9. Most past studies of the New Madrid earthquake sequence have indeed assumed ongoing microseismicity to be a continuing aftershock sequence10, 11, 12. Here we use instrumentally recorded aftershock locations and models of elastic stress change to develop a kinematically consistent rupture scenario for three of the four largest earthquakes of the 1811–1812 New Madrid sequence. Our results suggest that these three events occurred on two contiguous faults, producing lobes of increased stress near fault intersections and end points, in areas where present-day microearthquakes have been hitherto interpreted as evidence of primary mainshock rupture. We infer that the remaining New Madrid mainshock may have occurred more than 200 km north of this region in the Wabash Valley of southern Indiana and Illinois—an area that contains abundant modern microseismicity, and where substantial liquefaction was documented by historic accounts. Our results suggest that future large mid-plate earthquake sequences may extend over a much broader region than previously suspected.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Earth science New Madrid in motionNature News and Views (23 Jun 2005)
Earth science Lasting earthquake legacyNature News and Views (05 Nov 2009)
See all 12 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Supplementary InformationNature Geoscience Article (01 Oct 2009)
Space geodetic evidence for rapid strain rates in the New Madrid seismic zone of central USANature Letters to Editor (23 Jun 2005)
See all 57 matches for Research
