Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Variable female preferences drive complex male displays

Abstract

Complexity in male sexual displays is widely appreciated1 but diversity in female mate choice has received little attention. Males of many species have sexual displays composed of multiple display traits, and females are thought to use these different traits in mate choice1. Models of multiple display trait evolution suggest that these traits provide females with different kinds of information in different stages of the mate choice process2, or function as redundant signals to improve the accuracy of mate assessment3,4. We suggest that complex male displays might also arise because of variation in female preferences for particular male display traits. The causes of female preference variation have received little attention5,6,7, and the role of preference variation in shaping complex male displays is unclear. Here we show that in satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) female mate choice is a multistage process, where females of different ages use different male display traits in successive stages. Age- and stage-specific female preferences may contribute to explaining the widespread occurrence of multifaceted male displays.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Photograph of a bower with experimentally augmented blue decorations in 2000.
Figure 2: Mean proportion of females that returned to experimental (filled bars) or control (open bars) males for pre-NB courtships in 1999 (a) and 2000 (b).
Figure 3: Mean proportion of females that returned to experimental (filled bars) or control (open bars) males for post-NB courtships in 1999 (a) and 2000 (b).
Figure 4: Proportion of females that mated with experimental males (filled bars) or control males (open bars) in 1999 (a) and 2000 (b).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borgia, G. Complex male display and female choice in the spotted bowerbird: specialized functions for different bower decorations. Anim. Behav. 49, 1291–1301 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Møller, A. P. & Pomiankowski, A. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32, 167–176 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnstone, R. A. Multiple displays in animal communication: ‘backup signals’ and ‘multiple messages’. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 329–338 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks, R. & Endler, J. A. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55, 1644–1655 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kodric-Brown, A. & Nicoletto, P. F. Age and experience affect female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Am. Nat. 157, 316–323 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore, P. J. & Moore, A. J. Reproductive aging and mating: The ticking biological clock in female cockroaches. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9171–9176 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Borgia, G. Bower quality, number of decorations and male mating success of male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): an experimental analysis. Anim. Behav. 33, 266–271 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patricelli, G. L., Uy, J. A. C., Walsh, G. & Borgia, G. Sexual selection: male displays adjusted to female's response. Nature 415, 279–280 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Patricelli, G. L., Uy, J. A. C. & Borgia, G. Female signals enhance the efficiency of mate assessment in satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus). Behav. Ecol. 15, 297–304 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uy, J. A. C., Patricelli, G. L. & Borgia, G. Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus). Am. Nat. 158, 530–542 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Uy, J. A. C., Patricelli, G. L. & Borgia, G. Dynamic mate searching tactic allows female satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) to reduce searching. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 251–256 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Uy, J. A. C., Patricelli, G. L. & Borgia, G. Loss of preferred mate forces female satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) to increase mate searching. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 633–638 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Widemo, F. & Sæther, S. A. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 26–31 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72, 283–327 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson, R. M. & Langen, T. A. How do animals choose their mates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 468–470 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Höglund, J. & Alatalo, R. Leks (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Borgia, G. & Gore, M. A. Sexual competition by feather stealing in the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus). Anim. Behav. 34, 727–738 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. S. Wilkinson, K. L. Shaw, J. A. C. Uy and T. C. Mendelson for comments on the manuscript, and M. C. Christman for statistical advice. We also thank the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme, New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, the landowners at Wallaby Creek, and the 1998–2000 field assistants. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, Animal Behavior Program (USA) to G.B., and by fellowships from the Behavior, Ecology, Evolution and Systematics Program of the University of Maryland, and the N.S.F. Research Training Grant to S.W.C. and G.L.P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail L. Patricelli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1

Reflectance spectra for the blue decorations used in the augmentation experiment. (PDF 41 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Spreadsheet containing data used in all analyses in 1999. (DOC 216 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Spreadsheet containing data used in all analyses in 2000. (DOC 244 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Effects of the decoration augmentation experiment on the mate choices of females that re-mated with mates from 1999, or switched mates between 1999 and 2000. (DOC 34 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

Test statistics for comparisons among female age classes in the proportions of females that returned for pre-NB courtships with experimental males. (DOC 44 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

Test statistics for comparisons among female age classes in the proportions of females that returned for post-NB courtships with experimental males. (DOC 44 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

Test statistics for female mating preferences for male with augmented blue bower decorations. (DOC 31 kb)

Supplementary Table 7

Test statistics for among age class comparisons of the proportions of females that chose an experimental male as a mate (DOC 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, S., Patricelli, G. & Borgia, G. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature 428, 742–745 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02419

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02419

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing