Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 428, 255 (18 March 2004) | doi:10.1038/428255c
Confidential reports may improve peer review
Pedro Cintas1
- Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Extremadura, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain
Jean-Patrick Connerade in Correspondence ("Scandals stem from low priority of peer review" Nature 427, 196; 2004) offers an excellent perspective on the current status of the peer-review system.Although I agree with his main argument that refereeing needs further recognition, I disagree with the suggestion that recent cases of misconduct, plagiarism and other problems arise from the low priority of peer review.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Scandals stem from the low priority of peer reviewNature Correspondence (15 Jan 2004)
Scandals stem from the low priority of peer reviewNature Correspondence (15 Jan 2004)