Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 427, 342-344 (22 January 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02226; Received 26 June 2003; Accepted 19 November 2003
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
nature jobs
Natural Products Chemist
- Praj Matrix - Praj Industries Ltd
- Pune, Maharashtra Pune-411021 India
Manager Medical Writitng
- Indegene Lifesystems Pvt. Ltd
- Bengaluru 560 071 India
Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density
Marian Stamp Dawkins1, Christl A. Donnelly1,2 & Tracey A. Jones1
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
- Present address: Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PB, UK
Correspondence to: Marian Stamp Dawkins1 Email: marian.dawkins@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Abstract
Intensive broiler (meat) chicken production now exceeds 800 million birds each year in the United Kingdom and 2
1010 birds worldwide1, but it attracts accusations of poor welfare2, 3. The European Union is currently adopting standards for broilers aimed at a chief welfare concern—namely, overcrowding—by limiting maximum 'stocking density' (bird weight per unit area). It is not clear, however, whether this will genuinely improve bird welfare because evidence is contradictory4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Here we report on broiler welfare in relation to the European Union proposals through a large-scale study (2.7 million birds) with the unprecedented cooperation of ten major broiler producers in an experimental manipulation of stocking density under a range of commercial conditions. Producer companies stocked birds to five different final densities, but otherwise followed company practice, which we recorded in addition to temperature, humidity, litter and air quality. We assessed welfare through mortality, physiology, behaviour and health, with an emphasis on leg health and walking ability. Our results show that differences among producers in the environment that they provide for chickens have more impact on welfare than has stocking density itself.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Insect behaviour Arboreal ants build traps to capture preyNature Brief Communication (21 Apr 2005)

