Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 427, 244-247 (15 January 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02169; Received 30 June 2003; Accepted 10 October 2003
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Protect Enzyme from In Planta Degradation
A proposal for stable expression of an enzyme in corn seed is desired.
-
Efficient Chromosome Doubling: Plant Cell Division
The Seeker is looking for an efficient chromosome doubling method in plants and in particular, metho...
nature jobs
Three Associate Senior Lecturer positions within Natural Sciences
- The University of Kalmar
- Kalmar, Sweden
Scientist, Recombinant Protein Expression
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen
- Copenhagen 2200 Denmark
Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning
Konrad P. Körding1 & Daniel M. Wolpert1
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
Correspondence to: Konrad P. Körding1 Email: konrad@koerding.de
Abstract
When we learn a new motor skill, such as playing an approaching tennis ball, both our sensors and the task possess variability. Our sensors provide imperfect information about the ball's velocity, so we can only estimate it. Combining information from multiple modalities can reduce the error in this estimate1, 2, 3, 4. On a longer time scale, not all velocities are a priori equally probable, and over the course of a match there will be a probability distribution of velocities. According to bayesian theory5, 6, an optimal estimate results from combining information about the distribution of velocities—the prior—with evidence from sensory feedback. As uncertainty increases, when playing in fog or at dusk, the system should increasingly rely on prior knowledge. To use a bayesian strategy, the brain would need to represent the prior distribution and the level of uncertainty in the sensory feedback. Here we control the statistical variations of a new sensorimotor task and manipulate the uncertainty of the sensory feedback. We show that subjects internally represent both the statistical distribution of the task and their sensory uncertainty, combining them in a manner consistent with a performance-optimizing bayesian process4, 5. The central nervous system therefore employs probabilistic models during sensorimotor learning.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Crystal structure of human osteoclast cathepsin K complex with E-64Nature Structural Biology Correspondence (01 Feb 1997)
Cerebral blood flow response in adenosine 2a receptor knockout mice during transient hypoxic hypoxiaJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism Original Article
Optimal sensorimotor transformations for balanceNature Neuroscience Article (01 Oct 2007)
See all 47 matches for Research
