Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 427, 244-247 (15 January 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02169; Received 30 June 2003; Accepted 10 October 2003
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
nature jobs
Faculty - Plant Cellular & Molecular Biology, Molecular Genetics & the Plant Molecular Biology / Biotechnology Program
- The Ohio State University
- Columbus, Ohio
Faculty Position - Center for Viral Oncology
- University of Kansas Medical Center
- Kansas City, KS
Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning
Konrad P. Körding1 & Daniel M. Wolpert1
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
Correspondence to: Konrad P. Körding1 Email: konrad@koerding.de
Abstract
When we learn a new motor skill, such as playing an approaching tennis ball, both our sensors and the task possess variability. Our sensors provide imperfect information about the ball's velocity, so we can only estimate it. Combining information from multiple modalities can reduce the error in this estimate1, 2, 3, 4. On a longer time scale, not all velocities are a priori equally probable, and over the course of a match there will be a probability distribution of velocities. According to bayesian theory5, 6, an optimal estimate results from combining information about the distribution of velocities—the prior—with evidence from sensory feedback. As uncertainty increases, when playing in fog or at dusk, the system should increasingly rely on prior knowledge. To use a bayesian strategy, the brain would need to represent the prior distribution and the level of uncertainty in the sensory feedback. Here we control the statistical variations of a new sensorimotor task and manipulate the uncertainty of the sensory feedback. We show that subjects internally represent both the statistical distribution of the task and their sensory uncertainty, combining them in a manner consistent with a performance-optimizing bayesian process4, 5. The central nervous system therefore employs probabilistic models during sensorimotor learning.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perceptionNature Neuroscience Article (01 Apr 2006)
Optimal sensorimotor transformations for balanceNature Neuroscience Article (01 Oct 2007)
See all 37 matches for Research
