Letters to Nature

Nature 427, 247-252 (15 January 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02236; Received 24 July 2003; Accepted 14 November 2003

Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist

Ross D. King1, Kenneth E. Whelan1, Ffion M. Jones1, Philip G. K. Reiser1, Christopher H. Bryant2, Stephen H. Muggleton3, Douglas B. Kell4 & Stephen G. Oliver5

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, UK
  2. School of Computing, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 1FR, UK
  3. Department of Computing, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  4. Department of Chemistry, UMIST, P.O. Box 88, Manchester M60 1QD, UK
  5. School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, 2.205 Stopford Building, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

Correspondence to: Stephen G. Oliver5 Email: steve.oliver@man.ac.uk

The question of whether it is possible to automate the scientific process is of both great theoretical interest1, 2 and increasing practical importance because, in many scientific areas, data are being generated much faster than they can be effectively analysed. We describe a physically implemented robotic system that applies techniques from artificial intelligence3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 to carry out cycles of scientific experimentation. The system automatically originates hypotheses to explain observations, devises experiments to test these hypotheses, physically runs the experiments using a laboratory robot, interprets the results to falsify hypotheses inconsistent with the data, and then repeats the cycle. Here we apply the system to the determination of gene function using deletion mutants of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and auxotrophic growth experiments9. We built and tested a detailed logical model (involving genes, proteins and metabolites) of the aromatic amino acid synthesis pathway. In biological experiments that automatically reconstruct parts of this model, we show that an intelligent experiment selection strategy is competitive with human performance and significantly outperforms, with a cost decrease of 3-fold and 100-fold (respectively), both cheapest and random-experiment selection.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

Extra navigation

.

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT