Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin

Abstract

Languages, like genes, provide vital clues about human history1,2. The origin of the Indo-European language family is “the most intensively studied, yet still most recalcitrant, problem of historical linguistics”3. Numerous genetic studies of Indo-European origins have also produced inconclusive results4,5,6. Here we analyse linguistic data using computational methods derived from evolutionary biology. We test two theories of Indo-European origin: the ‘Kurgan expansion’ and the ‘Anatolian farming’ hypotheses. The Kurgan theory centres on possible archaeological evidence for an expansion into Europe and the Near East by Kurgan horsemen beginning in the sixth millennium BP7,8. In contrast, the Anatolian theory claims that Indo-European languages expanded with the spread of agriculture from Anatolia around 8,000–9,500 years bp9. In striking agreement with the Anatolian hypothesis, our analysis of a matrix of 87 languages with 2,449 lexical items produced an estimated age range for the initial Indo-European divergence of between 7,800 and 9,800 years bp. These results were robust to changes in coding procedures, calibration points, rooting of the trees and priors in the bayesian analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Consensus tree and divergence-time estimates.

References

  1. Pagel, M. in Time Depth in Historical Linguistics (eds Renfrew, C., McMahon, A. & Trask, L.) 189–207 (The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, UK, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gray, R. D. & Jordan, F. M. Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature 405, 1052–1055 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Diamond, J. & Bellwood, P. Farmers and their languages: the first expansions. Science 300, 597–603 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards, M. et al. Tracing European founder lineage in the Near Eastern mtDNA pool. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 1251–1276 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Semoni, O. et al. The genetic legacy of Paleolithic Homo sapiens in extant Europeans: a Y chromosome perspective. Science 290, 1155–1159 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chikhi, L., Nichols, R. A., Barbujani, G. & Beaumont, M. A. Y genetic data support the Neolithic Demic Diffusion Model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11008–11013 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gimbutas, M. The beginning of the Bronze Age in Europe and the Indo-Europeans 3500–2500 B.C. J. Indo-Eur. Stud. 1, 163–214 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mallory, J. P. Search of the Indo-Europeans: Languages, Archaeology and Myth (Thames & Hudson, London, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Renfrew, C. in Time Depth in Historical Linguistics (eds Renfrew, C., McMahon, A. & Trask, L.) 413–439 (The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, UK, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Swadesh, M. Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 96, 453–463 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bergsland, K. & Vogt, H. On the validity of glottochronology. Curr. Anthropol. 3, 115–153 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blust, R. in Time Depth in Historical Linguistics (eds Renfrew, C., McMahon, A. & Trask, L.) 311–332 (The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, UK, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steel, M. A., Hendy, M. D. & Penny, D. Loss of information in genetic distances. Nature 333, 494–495 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Swofford, D. L., Olsen, G. J., Waddell, P. J. & Hillis, D. M. in Molecular Systematics (eds Hillis, D., Moritz, C. & Mable, B. K.) 407–514 (Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dixon, R. M. W. The Rise and Fall of Language (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H. & Teller, E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1091 (1953)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J. P. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294, 2310–2314 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huson, D. H. SplitsTree: analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14, 68–73 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanderson, M. R8s, Analysis of Rates of Evolution,Version 1.50 (Univ. California, Davis, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B. & Black, P. FILE IE-DATA1. Available at 〈http://www.ntu.edu.au/education/langs/ielex/IE-DATA1〉 (1997).

  21. Sanderson, M. J. & Donoghue, M. J. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43, 1781–1795 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gamkrelidze, T. V. & Ivanov, V. V. Trends in Linguistics 80: Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Rexova, K., Frynta, D. & Zrzavy, J. Cladistic analysis of languages: Indo-European classification based on lexicostatistical data. Cladistics 19, 120–127 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ringe, D., Warnow, T. & Taylor, A. IndoEuropean and computational cladistics. Trans. Philol. Soc. 100, 59–129 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gkiasta, M., Russell, T., Shennan, S. & Steele, J. Neolithic transition in Europe: the radiocarbon record revisited. Antiquity 77, 45–62 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A. The History and Geography of Human Genes (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Holden, C. J. Bantu language trees reflect the spread of farming across sub-Saharan Africa: a maximum-parsimony analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 793–799 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barbrook, A. C., Howe, C. J., Blake, N. & Robinson, P. The phylogeny of The Canterbury Tales. Nature 394, 839 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McMahon, A. & McMahon, R. Finding families: Quantitative methods in language classification. Trans. Philol. Soc. 101, 7–55 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Allan, L. Campbell, L. Chikhi, M. Corballis, N. Gavey, S. Greenhill, J. Hamm, J. Huelsenbeck, G. Nichols, A. Rodrigo, F. Ronquist, M. Sanderson and S. Shennan for useful advice and/or comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell D. Gray.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, R., Atkinson, Q. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426, 435–439 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02029

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02029

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing