Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 425, 297-299 (18 September 2003) | doi:10.1038/nature01963; Received 14 May 2003; Accepted 23 July 2003
nature jobs
Tenure-Track Faculty Positions
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Dallas, TX 75390-9148 United States
Dermapathologist
- Indiana University School of Medicine
- Indiana, USA
Monkeys reject unequal pay
Sarah F. Brosnan1 & Frans B. M. de Waal1
- Living Links, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA
Email: sbrosna@emory.edu
Abstract
During the evolution of cooperation it may have become critical for individuals to compare their own efforts and pay-offs with those of others. Negative reactions may occur when expectations are violated. One theory proposes that aversion to inequity can explain human cooperation within the bounds of the rational choice model1, and may in fact be more inclusive than previous explanations2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Although there exists substantial cultural variation in its particulars, this 'sense of fairness' is probably a human universal9, 10 that has been shown to prevail in a wide variety of circumstances11, 12, 13. However, we are not the only cooperative animals14, hence inequity aversion may not be uniquely human. Many highly cooperative nonhuman species seem guided by a set of expectations about the outcome of cooperation and the division of resources15, 16. Here we demonstrate that a nonhuman primate, the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella), responds negatively to unequal reward distribution in exchanges with a human experimenter. Monkeys refused to participate if they witnessed a conspecific obtain a more attractive reward for equal effort, an effect amplified if the partner received such a reward without any effort at all. These reactions support an early evolutionary origin of inequity aversion.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).

