Access

Letters to Nature

Nature 423, 264-267 (15 May 2003) | doi:10.1038/nature01622; Received 6 December 2002; Accepted 26 March 2003

Open Innovation Challenges

  • Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions

    • Deadline: Jan 17 2010
    • Reward: $10,000 USD

    The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...

  • Single-cell Analysis Platform

    • Deadline: Dec 02 2009
    • Reward: $5,000 USD

    This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...

naturejobs

Chaos-assisted capture of irregular moons

Sergey A. Astakhov1, Andrew D. Burbanks2, Stephen Wiggins2 & David Farrelly1

  1. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-0300, USA
  2. School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TW, UK

Correspondence to: Stephen Wiggins2David Farrelly1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.W. (Email: s.wiggins@bristol.ac.uk) or D.F. (Email: david@habanero.chem.usu.edu).

Top

It has been thought1, 2, 3 that the capture of irregular moons—with non-circular orbits—by giant planets occurs by a process in which they are first temporarily trapped by gravity inside the planet's Hill sphere (the region where planetary gravity dominates over solar tides4). The capture of the moons is then made permanent by dissipative energy loss (for example, gas drag3) or planetary growth2. But the observed distributions of orbital inclinations, which now include numerous newly discovered moons5, 6, 7, 8, cannot be explained using current models. Here we show that irregular satellites are captured in a thin spatial region where orbits are chaotic9, and that the resulting orbit is either prograde or retrograde depending on the initial energy. Dissipation then switches these long-lived chaotic orbits10 into nearby regular (non-chaotic) zones from which escape is impossible. The chaotic layer therefore dictates the final inclinations of the captured moons. We confirm this with three-dimensional Monte Carlo simulations that include nebular drag3, 4, 11, and find good agreement with the observed inclination distributions of irregular moons at Jupiter7 and Saturn8. In particular, Saturn has more prograde irregular moons than Jupiter, which we can explain as a result of the chaotic prograde progenitors being more efficiently swept away from Jupiter by its galilean moons.