Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Neuronal synchrony does not correlate with motion coherence in cortical area MT

Abstract

Natural visual scenes are cluttered with multiple objects whose individual features must somehow be selectively linked (or ‘bound’) if perception is to coincide with reality. Recent neurophysiological evidence1,2 supports a ‘binding-by-synchrony’ hypothesis3: neurons excited by features of the same object fire synchronously, while neurons excited by features of different objects do not. Moving plaid patterns offer a straightforward means to test this idea. By appropriate manipulations of apparent transparency, the component gratings of a plaid pattern can be seen as parts of a single coherently moving surface or as two non-coherently moving surfaces. We examined directional tuning and synchrony of area-MT neurons in awake, fixating primates in response to perceptually coherent and non-coherent plaid patterns. Here we show that directional tuning correlated highly with perceptual coherence, which is consistent with an earlier study4. Although we found stimulus-dependent synchrony, coherent plaids elicited significantly less synchrony than did non-coherent plaids. Our data therefore do not support the binding-by-synchrony hypothesis as applied to this class of motion stimuli in area MT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Stimulus and monkey psychophysics.
Figure 2: Data from two neuronal pairs.
Figure 3: Synchrony magnitude firing rate and component-pattern indices cross-plotted for each pair-wise stimulus comparison.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K. & Singer, W. Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338, 334–337 (1989)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Singer, W. & Gray, C. M. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 555–586 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. von der Malsburg, C. & Schneider, W. A neural cocktail party processor. Biol. Cybern. 54, 29–40 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stoner, G. R. & Albright, T. D. Neural correlates of perceptual motion coherence. Nature 358, 412–414 (1992)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stoner, G. R., Albright, T. D. & Ramachandran, V. S. Transparency and coherence in human motion perception. Nature 344, 153–155 (1990)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoner, G. R. & Albright, T. D. Motion coherency rules are form-cue invariant. Vision Res. 32, 465–475 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoner, G. R. & Albright, T. D. Luminance contrast affects motion coherency in plaid patterns by acting as a depth-from-occlusion cue. Vision Res. 38, 387–401 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindsey, D. T. & Todd, J. T. On the relative contributions of motion energy and transparency to the perception of moving plaids. Vision Res. 36, 207–222 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singer, W. Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations. Neuron 24, 49–65 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bair, W., Zohary, E. & Newsome, W. T. Correlated firing in macaque visual area MT: time scales and relationship to behavior. J. Neurosci. 21, 1676–1697 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Movshon, J. A., Adelson, E. H., Gizzi, M. & Newsome, W. T. Study Group on Pattern Recognition (eds Chagas, T., Gattass, R. & Gross, C. G.) 117–151 (Pontifica Academia Scientiarum, Vatican City, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rodman, H. R. & Albright, T. D. Single-unit analysis of pattern-motion-selective properties in the middle temporal visual area. Exp. Brain Res. 75, 53–64 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Castelo-Branco, M., Goebel, R., Neuenschwander, S. & Singer, W. Neural synchrony correlates with surface segregation rules. Nature 405, 685–689 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pack, C. C., Berezovskii, V. K. & Born, R. T. Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert and anaesthetized macaque monkeys. Nature 414, 905–908 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. de Oliveira, S. C., Thiele, A. & Hoffmann, K. P. Synchronization of neuronal activity during stimulus expectation in a direction discrimination task. J. Neurosci. 17, 9248–9260 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreiter, A. K. & Singer, W. Stimulus-dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 16, 2381–2396 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thiele, A., Distler, C. & Hoffmann, K. P. Decision-related activity in the macaque dorsal visual pathway. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 2044–2058 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Batschelet, E. Animal Orientation and Navigation (eds Galler, S. R., Schmidt-Koenig, K., Jacobs, G. J. & Belleville, R. E.) 61–91 (NASA Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington DC, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aertsen, A. M., Gerstein, G. L., Habib, M. K. & Palm, G. Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of “effective connectivity”. J. Neurophysiol. 61, 900–917 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eggermont, J. J. & Smith, G. M. Neural connectivity only accounts for a small part of neural correlation in auditory cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 110, 379–391 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stoner, G. R. & Albright, T. D. The interpretation of visual motion: evidence for surface segmentation mechanisms. Vision Res. 36, 1291–1310 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Constanza and D. Diep for technical assistance. We also thank T. D. Albright, J. R. Reynolds, G. Boynton and J. Hegdé for discussions on this work and comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gene Stoner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thiele, A., Stoner, G. Neuronal synchrony does not correlate with motion coherence in cortical area MT. Nature 421, 366–370 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01285

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01285

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing