Figures and Tables
From the following article:
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
and Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium
Nature 420, 520-562(5 December 2002)
doi:10.1038/nature01262
Figure 3
Segments and blocks >300 kb in size with conserved synteny in human are superimposed on the mouse genome.
Full size figure and legend (54K)Figure 4
Dot plots of conserved syntenic segments in three human and three mouse chromosomes.
Full size figure and legend (60K)Figure 5
Size distribution of segments and blocks with synteny conserved between mouse and human.
Full size figure and legend (30K)Figure 6
Size ratio of mouse to human for orthologous 100-kb windows.
Full size figure and legend (36K)Figure 7
Distribution of (G+C) content in the mouse (blue) and human (red) genomes.
Full size figure and legend (31K)Figure 8
(G+C) content and density of CpG islands shows more variability in human (red) than mouse (blue) chromosomes.
Full size figure and legend (37K)Figure 10
Age distribution of interspersed repeats in the mouse and human genomes.
Full size figure and legend (80K)Figure 11
Density of interspersed repeat classes at different (G+C) content in the mouse (a) and human (b) genomes.
Full size figure and legend (70K)Figure 12
Conservation of (G+C) content and convergence of interspersed repeat distribution between the human and mouse genomes.
Full size figure and legend (148K)Figure 13
Correlation of order-specific SINEs and LINEs in human and mouse orthologous regions.
Full size figure and legend (64K)Figure 14
The zinc-finger homeobox 1b (Zfhx1b) loci in human and mouse are both repeat poor.
Full size figure and legend (56K)Figure 15
Comparison of L1 characteristics of autosomes and sex chromosomes as a function of (G+C) content in mouse (blue) and human (red).
Full size figure and legend (71K)Figure 16
Structure of a new homologue of dystrophin as predicted on mouse chromosome 1 and human chromosome 2.
Full size figure and legend (22K)Figure 17
Taxonomic breakdown of homologues of mouse proteins according to taxonomic range.
Full size figure and legend (25K)Figure 18
Gene ontology (GO) annotations for mouse and human proteins.
Full size figure and legend (114K)Figure 20
Cytochrome P450 protein families in mouse, human and pufferfish.
Full size figure and legend (55K)Figure 22
Dot plot showing genomic alignment between mouse and human.
Full size figure and legend (115K)Figure 24
Comparison of histograms for conservation scores for 100-bp windows in ancient transposons (red) with 100-bp windows in other kinds of regions (blue and green).
Full size figure and legend (73K)Figure 26
The human spermidine synthase gene (SRM) on chromosome 1, involved in the biosynthesis of polyamines, and its mouse orthologue (Srm) on chromosome 4.
Full size figure and legend (10K)Figure 27
Conservation scores for 50-bp windows in a 4.5-kb region containing the human insulin-like growth factor binding protein acid labile subunit (IGFALS) gene.
Full size figure and legend (23K)Figure 28
Proportion of the human genome under selection and the probability of a genomic window to be under selection on the basis of conservation score.
Full size figure and legend (39K)Figure 29
Estimated average number of substitutions per site in ancestral repeat sites (tAR) (red) and in fourfold degenerate (4D) sites (t4D) (blue) for each human chromosome.
Full size figure and legend (83K)Figure 31
Expected number of substitutions in fourfold degenerate (4D) sites (a) and ancestral repeat sites (b) plotted against human (G+C) content.
Full size figure and legend (126K)Table 6
Divergence levels of interspersed repeats predating the human–mouse speciation
Full size table and legendTable 12
KA, KS, KA/KS and pairwise percentage amino acid identities for 1:1 mouse-human orthologues
Full size table and legend






























