Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Plant-fungal interactions

When good relationships go bad

Mycorrhizal associations of fungi and plants are usually viewed as mutually beneficial, but some non-photosynthetic plants cheat their fungal partners. Molecular tools can now be used to identify the fungi being exploited.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Partners in an epiparasitic symbiosis.

JOSEPH B. MORTON (a); ALICIA SÉRSIC (b)

References

  1. Bidartondo, M. I. et al. Nature 419, 389–392 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cullings, K. W., Szaro, T. M. & Bruns, T. D. Nature 379, 63–66 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, D. L. & Bruns, T. D. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4510–4515 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bever, J. D., Schultz, P. A., Pringle, A. & Morton, J. B. Bioscience 51, 923–931 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bever, J. D., Morton, J. B., Antonovics, J. & Schultz, P. A. J. Ecol. 84, 71–82 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanders, I. R. & Fitter, A. H. Mycol. Res. 96, 415–419 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Heijden, M. G. A. et al. Nature 396, 69–72 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Herre, E. A., Knowlton, N., Mueller, U. G. & Rehner, S. A. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 49–53 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bronstein, J. L. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 214–217 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pellmyr, O., Leebens-Mack, J. & Huth, C. J. Nature 380, 155–156 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hibbett, D. S., Gilbert, L.-B. & Donoghue, M. J. Nature 407, 506–508 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lutzoni, F., Pagel, M. & Reeb, V. Nature 411, 937–940 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Modjo, H. S. & Hendrix, J. W. Phytopathology 76, 688–691 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, N. C., Graham, J. H. & Smith, F. A. New Phytol. 135, 575–585 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Hibbett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hibbett, D. When good relationships go bad. Nature 419, 345–346 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/419345a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/419345a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing