Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 417, 897 (27 June 2002) | doi:10.1038/417897b
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Pharmacology Group Leader
- S*BIO Pte Ltd
- Singapore
Multiple Postdoctoral Positions
- University of Iowa
- Coralville, Iowa, USA
Conflicts around a study of Mexican crops
Kenneth Worthy1, Richard C. Strohman2 & Paul R. Billings3
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, 135 Giannini Hall, Berkeley, California 94720-3312, USA
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 229 Stanley Hall, Berkeley, California 94720-3206, USA
- GeneSage, Inc., 589 Howard Street, San Francisco, California 94105, USA
Correspondence to: Kenneth Worthy1 Email: kworthy@nature.berkeley.edu
The controversy surrounding Quist and Chapela's findings of transgenic introgression in Mexican maize1, 2, 3, 4 is taking place within webs of political and financial influence that compromise the objectivity of their critics.The eight authors of the two published criticisms1, 2 of Quist and Chapela's paper4 have had all or part of their research funded by the Torrey Mesa Research Institute (TMRI), an offspring of the agricultural biotechnology company Novartis (now Syngenta).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
