Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Commentary
Nature 417, 789 (20 June 2002) | doi:10.1038/417789a
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Project Manager – Scientist in Emulsions and Foams
- Nestle Research Center
- Lausanne, Switzerland
Dean, Faculty of Science
- University of Victoria
- Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Is a bell tolling for Bell Labs?
Paul Grant1
- Paul Grant is a science fellow at the Electric Power Research Institute, PO Box 10412, 3412 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94303, USA.
Abstract
It would be wise of Bell Labs to help others reproduce their scientists' results.
Dark clouds quickly began to gather over the exceptional finding of superconductivity at 117 K reported last year by Hendrik Schön and collaborators at Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey. Shortly after publication of the paper, I was asked by a reporter aware of my reputation as a sceptical observer of reports of 'unidentified superconducting objects' whether I felt uncomfortable that no one had reproduced any of the Bell Labs's field-effect transistor (FET) superconductivity results.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
