FIGURE 2. Quantitative comparison of interaction data sets.

From the following article:

Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions

Christian von Mering, Roland Krause, Berend Snel, Michael Cornell, Stephen G. Oliver, Stanley Fields and Peer Bork

Nature 417, 399-403(23 May 2002)

doi:10.1038/nature750

BACK TO ARTICLE

The various data sets are benchmarked against a reference set of 10,907 trusted interactions, which are derived from protein complexes annotated manually at MIPS17 and YPD24. Coverage and accuracy are lower limits owing to incompleteness of the reference set. Each dot in the graph represents an entire interaction data set, and its position specifies coverage and accuracy (on a log–log scale). For the combined evidence, we considered only interactions supported by an agreement of two (or three) of any of the methods shown. For most data sets, raw and filtered data are shown, demonstrating the trade-off between coverage and accuracy achieved by filtering (see Supplementary Information for details on the filtering).

Figures & Tables index
BACK TO ARTICLE