Access

Letters to Nature

Nature 417, 271-275 (16 May 2002) | doi:10.1038/417271a; Received 16 October 2001; Accepted 18 February 2002

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem

Graham E. Budd1

  1. Department of Earth Sciences (Historical Geology and Palaeontology), Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 22, Uppsala, Sweden SE-752 36
    Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to the author (e-mail: Email: graham.budd@pal.uu.se).

Top

The composition of the arthropod head has been one of the most controversial topics in zoology, with a large number of theories being proposed to account for it over the last century1. Although fossils have been recognized as being of potential importance in resolving the issue2, 3, a lack of consensus over their systematics4, 5 has obscured their contribution. Here, I show that a group of previously problematic Cambrian arthropods from the Burgess Shale and Chengjiang faunas form a clade close to crown-group euarthropods, the group containing myriapods, chelicerates, insects and crustaceans6. They are characterized by modified or even absent endopods, and two pre-oral appendages. Comparison with reconstructions of the crown-group euarthropod ground plan6 and recent investigations into onychophorans7, 8 demonstrates that these two appendages are the first antenna (of extant crustaceans) and a more anterior appendage associated with an ocular segment. The latter appendage has been reduced in all crown-group euarthropods. Its most likely relic is as a component of the labrum9. These fossils thus tie together results from disparate living groups (onychophorans and euarthropods).