Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A ‘periodic table’ for protein structures

Abstract

Current structural genomics programs aim systematically to determine the structures of all proteins coded in both human and other genomes, providing a complete picture of the number and variety of protein structures that exist. In the past, estimates have been made on the basis of the incomplete sample of structures currently known. These estimates have varied greatly (between 1,000 and 10,000; see for example refs 1 and 2), partly because of limited sample size but also owing to the difficulties of distinguishing one structure from another. This distinction is usually topological, based on the fold of the protein; however, in strict topological terms (neglecting to consider intra-chain cross-links), protein chains are open strings and hence are all identical. To avoid this trivial result, topologies are determined by considering secondary links in the form of intra-chain hydrogen bonds (secondary structure) and tertiary links formed by the packing of secondary structures. However, small additions to or loss of structure can make large changes to these perceived topologies and such subjective solutions are neither robust nor amenable to automation. Here I formalize both secondary and tertiary links to allow the rigorous and automatic definition of protein topology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Stick-figure representations of the basic Forms.
Figure 2: Simplified layer structure of proteins.
Figure 3: β-barrel helix packing variations.
Figure 4: Structure tables for flat sheets.
Figure 5: Fold numbers for ranked Forms.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chothia, C. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 357, 543–544 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Orengo, C. A., Jones, D. T. & Thornton, J. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372, 631–634 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eidhammer, I., Jonassen, I. & Taylor, W. R. Structure comparison and structure patterns. J. Comput. Biol. 7, 658–716 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T. & Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536–540 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Orengo, C. A. et al. CATH—a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5, 1093–1108 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mizuguchi, K., Deane, C. M., Blundell, T. L. & Overington, J. P. HOMSTRAD: a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. Protein Sci. 7, 2469–2471 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holm, L. & Sander, C. Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 231–234 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hadley, C. & Jones, D. T. A systematic comparison of protein structure classifications SCOP, CATH and FSSP. Structure 7, 1099–1112 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chothia, C. & Finkelstein, A. V. The classification and origins of protein folding patterns. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 59, 1007–1039 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Finkelstein, A. V. & Ptitsyn, O. B. Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns? Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 50, 171–190 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, F. E., Sternberg, M. J. E. & Taylor, W. R. Analysis and prediction of protein β-sheet structures by a combinatorial approach. Nature 285, 378–382 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, F. E., Sternberg, M. J. E. & Taylor, W. R. Analysis and prediction of the packing of α-helices against a β-sheet in the tertiary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 156, 821–862 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murzin, A. G., Lesk, A. M. & Chothia, C. Principles determining the structure of β-sheet barrels in proteins: I, A theoretical analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 236, 1396–1381 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor, W. R. Defining linear segments in protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 310, 1135–1150 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, W. R. Searching for the ideal forms of proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 264–269 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Murzin, A. G. & Finkelstein, A. V. General architecture of the α-helical globule. J. Mol. Biol. 204, 749–769 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, W. R., Jones, D. T. & Green, N. M. A method for α-helical integral membrane protein fold prediction. Protein Struct. Funct. Genet. 18, 281–294 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor, W. R. Protein structure domain identification. Protein Eng. 12, 203–216 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R. & Thornton, J. M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 385, 86–89 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chothia, C. & Murzin, A. G. New folds for all-β proteins. Structure 1, 217–222 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor, W. R. Protein structure comparison using bipartite graph matching and its application to protein structure classification. Mol. Cell. Proteom. advance online publication 4 March 2002 (DOI 10.1074/mcp.T200001-MCP200).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William R. Taylor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, W. A ‘periodic table’ for protein structures. Nature 416, 657–660 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/416657a

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/416657a

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing