Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Biomechanics (Communication arising)

Prey attack by a large theropod dinosaur

Abstract

Prey-capture strategies in carnivorous dinosaurs have been inferred from the biomechanical features of their tooth structure, the estimated bite force produced, and their diet1,2,3. Rayfield et al.4 have used finite-element analysis (FEA) to investigate such structure–function relationships in Allosaurus fragilis, and have found that the skull was designed to bear more stress than could be generated by simple biting. They conclude that this large theropod dinosaur delivered a chop-and-slash 'hatchet' blow to its prey, which it approached with its mouth wide open before driving its upper tooth row downwards. We argue that this mode of predation is unlikely, and that the FEA results, which relate to an 'overengineered' skull, are better explained by the biomechanical demands of prey capture. Understanding the mechanics of predation is important to our knowledge of the feeding habits of carnivorous dinosaurs and for accurate reconstruction their lifestyles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Skull of Allosaurus fragilis (after ref. 7).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farlow, J. O. Am. Mid. Nat. 95, 186–191 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farlow, J. O., Brinkman, D. L., Abler, W. L. & Currie, P. J. Mod. Geol. 16, 161–198 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erickson, G. M. et al. Nature 382, 706–707 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rayfield, E. J. et al. Nature 409, 1033–1037 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frazzetta, T. H. J. Morphol. 111, 287–320 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwenk, K. in Feeding in Tetrapod Vertebrates: Form, Function, Phylogeny (ed. Schwenk, K.) 175–291 (Academic, San Diego, 2000).

  7. Madsen, J. H. J. Utah Geol. Min. Surv. Bull. 109, 1–163 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ahlberg, P. E., Clack, J. A. & Luks̆evic̆s, E . Nature 381, 61–64 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frazzetta, T. H. in Advances in Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology (eds Rodin, A. G. J. & Miyata, K.) 222–244 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983).

  10. Frazzetta, T. H. in Evolutionary Biology (eds Hecht, M. K., Wallace, B. & Prance, G. T.) 419–461 (Plenum, New York, 1986).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth V. Kardong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frazzetta, T., Kardong, K. Prey attack by a large theropod dinosaur. Nature 416, 387–388 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/416387a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/416387a

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing