Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
news feature
Nature 416, 258-260 (21 March 2002) | doi:10.1038/416258a
Scientific publishing: Peer review, unmasked
Trisha Gura1
Top of page
Abstract
The editorial review of scientific papers usually takes place behind closed doors, but could the process be improved by opening it up for all to see? Trisha Gura investigates.
You have written an interesting but provocative paper that is likely to stir up debate. Where should you try to publish it?
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
