The handling of grey levels by these large displays paves the way for electronic paper.
Abstract
The main advantages of using soluble semiconductive polymers in microelectronic devices are ease of processing1,2,3 and mechanical flexibility4. Here we describe an active-matrix display with 64 × 64 pixels, each driven by a thin-film transistor with a solution-processed polymer semiconductor. In a significant step towards low-cost flexible displays, this polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal arrangement gives a reflective, low-power display with paper-like contrast, which can handle 256 grey levels while being refreshed at video speed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The pixel layout of the 2-inch (5.1-cm) display, which is based on the design for a small hand-held display, is shown in Fig. 1. First, the row electrodes are created by depositing and structuring a gold layer on a glass substrate. Next, an insulating layer of silicon nitride is applied. A second, patterned gold layer forms the column electrodes and the pixel pad. The pixel pad acts as an in-cell reflector, occupying 83% of the display area. On top of this stack, a polythienylenevinylene precursor film is spin-coated, converted into a semiconductor5 and patterned by photolithography. A spin-coated polyvinylphenol layer protects the active matrix.
Spacers are sprayed on top of this active matrix. A second substrate, coated with indium tin oxide, is applied over the spacers and glued to the active matrix. Finally, the display is filled with polymer-dispersed liquid crystals6, thereby avoiding polarizers and an alignment layer. This technology yields a low-cost display with a high contrast and a wide viewing angle7, and even allows flexible displays to be produced8,9. A polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal pixel is switched between light-scattering and transparent states by applying a voltage between the electrical contacts.
The display is driven line-by-line. During one frame time, all rows are sequentially selected by applying a negative voltage that reduces the channel resistance of its thin-film transistors (TFTs). The column voltage is then transferred through the channel of the TFTs to the corresponding pixels. During the rest of the frame time, the channel resistance is high, thereby retaining the charge on the pixels while the other rows are addressed.
An image on the display is shown in Fig. 2. It contains 256 grey levels, as required for displaying natural scenes. The maximum contrast ratio is 8.6, which is comparable to that of black ink on paper. The columns are driven between −12 V and 12 V to switch the pixels. The rows, which are connected to the gate of the TFTs, are driven between −27 V and 27 V. The maximum on-current of the TFT is 0.8 μA; an average of 0.4 μA is sufficient to charge a pixel during the row-selection time. The field-effect mobility is 1.5 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1. The off-current is below 20 pA, low enough to retain at least 99% of the pixel charge during the rest of the frame time. The on/off current ratio is 4 × 104, which matches the specifications for a display of this size. Because of the optimal pixel design, the display can be driven at refresh rates of up to 100 Hz.
Well defined grey levels require sufficient control of the 'spread' on the TFT parameters such as mobility, leakage current and threshold voltage. Measurements show a standard deviation in the contrast of a typical line in the display of 0.11 for white pixels and 0.14 for pixels switched to mid-grey. This small difference indicates that the spread on TFT parameters is only a minor factor in the uniformity of this display. We intend to optimize our solution-based technology to obtain the same uniformity over an even larger area, paving the way for a low-cost production process for large sheets of electronic paper.
References
Gelinck, G. H., Geuns, T. C. T. & de Leeuw, D. M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1487–1489 (2000).
Sirringhaus, H., Tessler, N. & Friend, R. H. Science 280, 1741–1744 (1998).
Levi, B. G. Phys. Today 20–22 (February 2001).
Voss, D. Nature 407, 442–444 (2000).
Tokito, S., Momii, T., Murata, H., Tsutsui, T. & Saito, S. Polymer 31, 1137–1141 (1990).
Vaz, N. A., Smith, G. W. & Montgomery, G. P. Jr Liquid Cryst. 146, 1–15 (1987).
Cornelissen, H. J., Neijzen, J. H. M., Paulissen, F. A. M. A. & Schlangen, L. J. M. J. Soc. Inform. Display 7, 37–41 (1999).
Kane, M. G. et al. IEEE Electr. Dev. Lett. 21, 534–536 (2000).
Rogers, J. A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4835–4840 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huitema, H., Gelinck, G., van der Putten, J. et al. Plastic transistors in active-matrix displays. Nature 414, 599 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/414599a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/414599a
This article is cited by
-
Advances in flexible organic field-effect transistors and their applications for flexible electronics
npj Flexible Electronics (2022)
-
The rise of electrochromics through dynamic QR codes and grayscale images in screen printed passive matrix addressed displays
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Effect of the Active Layer Thickness of Pentacene Thin Film Transistor; Illumination Effect
Journal of Electronic Materials (2021)
-
Silicon and oxygen synergistic effects for the discovery of new high-performance nonfullerene acceptors
Nature Communications (2020)
-
Morphology and optoelectronic characteristics of organic field-effect transistors based on blends of polylactic acid and poly(3-hexylthiophene)
Polymer Journal (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.