Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds

Abstract

A major component of human-induced global change is the deliberate or accidental translocation of species from their native ranges to alien environments1,2, where they may cause substantial environmental and economic damage3,4. Thus we need to understand why some introductions succeed while others fail. Successful introductions tend to be concentrated in certain regions2, especially islands and the temperate zone, suggesting that species-rich mainland and tropical locations are harder to invade because of greater biotic resistance1,5,6,7,8,9. However, this pattern could also reflect variation in the suitability of the abiotic environment at introduction locations for the species introduced3,9,10,11, coupled with known confounding effects of nonrandom selection of species and locations for introduction8,12,13,14. Here, we test these alternative hypotheses using a global data set of historical bird introductions, employing a statistical framework that accounts for differences among species and regions in terms of introduction success. By removing these confounding effects, we show that the pattern of avian introduction success is not consistent with the biotic resistance hypothesis. Instead, success depends on the suitability of the abiotic environment for the exotic species at the introduction site.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elton, C. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (Methuen, London, 1958).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Vitousek, P. M., D'Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., Rejmánek, M. & Westbrooks, R. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. NZ J. Ecol. 21, 1–16 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williamson, M. Biological Invasions (Chapman & Hall, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mack, R. N. et al. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Applic. 10, 689–710 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pimm, S. L. in Biological Invasions, a Global Perspective (eds Drake, J. et al.) 351–367 (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simberloff, D. in Biological Invasions, a Global Perspective (eds Drake, J. et al.) 61–75 (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Case, T. J. Invasion resistance, species build up, and community collapse in metapopulation models with inter-species competition. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42, 239–266 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rejmánek, M. in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in Tropical Forests (eds Orians, G. H., Dirzo, R. & Cushman, J. H.) 153–172 (Springer, Berlin, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Holdgate, M. W. Summary and conclusions: characteristics and consequences of biological invasions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 733–742 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Newsome, A. E. & Noble, I. R. in Ecology of Biological Invasions (eds Groves, R. H. & Burdon, J. J.) 1–20 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, J. H. in Biological Invasions, a Global Perspective (eds Drake, J. A. et al.) 85–109 (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crawley, M. J. The population biology of invaders. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 711–731 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Londsdale, W. M. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80, 1522–1536 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blackburn, T. M. & Duncan, R. P. Establishment patterns of exotic birds are constrained by non-random patterns in introduction. J. Biogeogr. (in the press).

  15. Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Case, T. J. Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biol. Conserv. 78, 69–96 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sol, D. Are islands more susceptible to be invaded than continents? Birds say no. Ecography 23, 687–692 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crawley, M. J., Harvey, P. H. & Purvis, A. in Plant Life Histories: Ecology, Phylogeny and Evolution (eds Silvertown, J., Franco, M. & Harper, J. L.) 36–52 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williamson, M. & Brown, K. C. The analysis and modelling of British invasions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 505–522 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown, J. H. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124, 255–279 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaston, K. J. Rarity 117–124 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Duncan, R. P., Bomford, M., Forsyth, D. M. & Conibear, L. High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geographical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate. J. Anim. Ecol. 70, 621–632 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis, A. J., Jenkinson, L. S., Lawton, J. H., Shorrocks, B. & Wood, S. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391, 783–786 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hodkinson, I. D. Species response to global environmental change or why ecophysiological models are important: a reply to Davis et al. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 1259–1262 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawton, J. H. & Brown, K. C. The population and community ecology of invading insects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 606–617 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Crawley, M. J. in Colonization, Succession and Stability: 26th Symposium of the British Ecological Society (eds Gray, A. J., Crawley, M. J. & Edwards, P. J.) 429–453 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ehrlich, P. R. in Biological Invasions, a Global Perspective (eds Drake, J. A. et al.) 315–328 (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, C. S., Lonsdale, W. M. & Fortune, J. When to ignore advice: invasion predictions and decision theory. Biol. Invas. 1, 89–96 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W. & Wolfinger, R. D. SAS System for Mixed Models (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goldstein, H. Multilevel Statistical Models (Edward Arnold, London, 1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Baker, J. Bale, J. Buonaccorsi, C. Frampton and R. Kinnersley for comments on the manuscript, and the University of Birmingham for funding assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim M. Blackburn.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blackburn, T., Duncan, R. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414, 195–197 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35102557

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35102557

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing