Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Unexpected inhibition of fusion in nucleus–nucleus collisions

Abstract

Unstable heavy atomic nuclei not found in nature can be created by fusing two stable nuclei, in a process analogous to colliding charged droplets of liquid. Recently, the formation of a handful of super-heavy nuclei with atomic numbers 114 (ref. 1) and 116 (ref. 2) has been achieved by fusion of heavy nuclei. The electrostatic energy of such systems is very large (which is the reason super-heavy nuclei are unstable), so although the two nuclei may initially be captured by the nuclear potential, rather than fusing, they almost always separate after transfer of mass to the lighter nucleus. This process, called quasi-fission3,4, can inhibit fusion by many orders of magnitude. Understanding this inhibition may hold the key to forming more super-heavy elements. Theoretically, inhibition is predicted (ref. 5 and references therein) when the product Z1Z2 of the charges of the projectile and target nuclei is larger than about 1,600. Here we report measurements of three fusion reactions with Z1Z2 around half this value, each forming 216 88Ra. We find convincing model-independent evidence both of inhibition of fusion, and of the presence of quasi-fission. These results defy interpretation within the standard picture of nuclear fusion and fission.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Experimental configurations for the two types of measurement and typical measured spectra.
Figure 2: Reduced cross-sections for ERs as a function of excitation energy for (a) all ERs and (b) radium ERs.
Figure 3: Experimental evidence for quasi-fission.
Figure 4: Fission barrier energies for 216Ra shown as a function of mass asymmetry, defined as the difference between the masses of the two parts of the elongated nuclear system divided by their sum.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oganessian, Yu. Ts. et al. Synthesis of nuclei of the superheavy element 114 in reactions induced by 48Ca. Nature 400, 242–245 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oganessian, Yu. Ts. et al. Observation of the decay of 292116. Phys. Rev. C 63, 011301R-1–011301R-2 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Back, B. B. Complete fusion and quasifission in reactions between heavy ions. Phys. Rev. C 31, 2104–2112 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Toke, J. et al. Quasi-fission—the mass-drift mode in heavy-ion reactions. Nucl. Phys. A 440, 327–365 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blocki, J. P., Feldmeier, H. & Swiatecki, W. J. Dynamical hindrance to compound-nucleus formation in heavy-ion reactions. Nucl. Phys. A 459, 145–172 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hinde, D. J., Leigh, J. R., Newton, J. O., Galster, W. & Sie, S. Fission and evaporation competition in 200Pb. Nucl. Phys. A 385, 109–132 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hahn, R. L., Toth, K. S., LeBeyec, Y., Lagarde, B. & Guidry, M. W. Reactions with 40Ar and 84Kr leading to the same compound nucleus, 200Po. Phys. Rev. C 36, 2132–2135 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahm, C.-C. et al. Fusion probability of symmetric heavy, nuclear systems determined from evaporation-residue cross sections. Nucl. Phys. A 441, 316–343 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morton, C. R. et al. Resolution of anomalous fission fragment anisotropies for the 16O + 208Pb reaction. Phys. Rev. C 52, 243–251 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hinde, D. J. et al. Conclusive evidence for the influence of nuclear orientation on quasifission. Phys. Rev. C 53, 1290–1300 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohr, N. Neutron capture and nuclear constitution. Nature 137, 344–348 (1936).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dasgupta, M., Hinde, D. J., Rowley, N. & Stefanini, A. M. Measuring barriers to fusion. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 48, 401–462 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagino, K., Rowley, N. & Kruppa, A. T. A program for coupled-channels calculations with all order couplings for heavy-ion fusion reactions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 123, 143–150 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lestone, J. P. et al. Pre-scission charged-particle multiplicities following the reactions 164,167,170Er + 28Si. Nucl. Phys. A 559, 277–316 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vergani, P. et al. Complete and incomplete fusion and emission of preequilibrium nucleons in the interaction of 12C with 197Au below 10 MeV/nucleon. Phys. Rev. C 48, 1815–1827 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rowley, N., Leigh, J. R., Wei, J. X. & Lindsay, R. Obtaining average angular momenta from fusion excitation functions near the Coulomb barrier. Phys. Lett. B 314, 179–184 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Balantekin, A. B., DeWeerd, A. J. & Kuyucak, S. Relations between fusion cross sections and average angular momenta. Phys. Rev. C 54, 1853–1862 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramamurthy, V. S. et al. Entrance-channel dependence of fission-fragment anisotropies: a direct experimental signature of fission before equilibration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 25–28 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ravi Prasad, G. V. & Ramamurthy, V. S. Light fragment emission during mass asymmetry relaxation in heavy-ion induced fission. Phys. Rev. C 54, 815–821 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies, K. T. R. & Sierk, A. J. Conditional saddle-point configurations. Phys. Rev. C 31, 915–922 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Möller, P. & Nix, J. R. Potential-energy surfaces for asymmetric heavy-ion reactions. Nucl. Phys. A 281, 354–372 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Abe, Y., Ayik, S., Reinhard, P.-G. & Suraud, E. On stochastic approaches of nuclear dynamics. Phys. Rep. 275, 49–196 (1996).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.D. acknowledges the support of a QEII Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Hinde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berriman, A., Hinde, D., Dasgupta, M. et al. Unexpected inhibition of fusion in nucleus–nucleus collisions. Nature 413, 144–147 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35093069

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35093069

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing