Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films

Abstract

The fluidity of water in confined geometries is relevant to processes ranging from tribology to protein folding, and its molecular mobility in pores and slits has been extensively studied using a variety of approaches1,2,3,4,5,6. Studies in which liquid flow is measured directly suggest that the viscosity of aqueous electrolytes confined to films of thickness greater than about 2–3 nm remains close to that in the bulk7,8,9; this behaviour is similar to that of non-associative organic liquids confined to films thicker than about 7–8 molecular layers8,10,11. Here we observe that the effective viscosity of water remains within a factor of three of its bulk value, even when it is confined to films in the thickness range 3.5 ± 1 to 0.0 ± 0.4 nm. This contrasts markedly with the behaviour of organic solvents, whose viscosity diverges when confined to films thinner than about 5–8 molecular layers10,11,12,13,14,15. We attribute this to the fundamentally different mechanisms of solidification in the two cases. For non-associative liquids, confinement promotes solidification by suppressing translational freedom of the molecules11,15,16,17,18; however, in the case of water, confinement seems primarily to suppress the formation of the highly directional hydrogen-bonded networks associated with freezing1,3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Normal surface interaction measurements used to control for the water and surface characteristics in our experiments.
Figure 2: Measurements of the shear forces between sliding mica surfaces across water during approach to contact.
Figure 3: Evaluation of the effective viscosity of confined water from the jump-in data (Fig. 2).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clifford, J. in Water in Disperse Systems (ed. Franks, F.) 75–132 (Plenum, New York and London, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Drake, J. M. & Klafter, J. Dynamics of confined molecular systems. Phys. Today 43, 43–45 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellissent-Funel, M.-C. & Dore, J. C. (eds) Hydrogen Bond Networks (NATO ASI Series) (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Xia, X., Perera, L., Essmann, U. & Berkowitz, M. L. The structure of water at platinum/water interfaces: Molecular dynamics computer simulations. Surf. Sci. 335, 401–415 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer, M. & Stanley, H. E. Liquid–liquid phase transition in confined water: A Monte Carlo study. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 9728–9730 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gallo, P., Rovere, M. & Spohr, E. Glass transition and layering effects in confined water: A computer simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 11324–11335 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts, A. D. & Tabor, D. The extrusion of liquids between highly elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 325, 323–345 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Israelachvili, J. N. Measurement of the viscosity of liquids in very thin films. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 110, 263–271 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Horn, R. G., Smith, D. T. & Haller, W. Surface forces and viscosity of water measured between silica sheets. Chem. Phys. Lett. 162, 404–408 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Granick, S. Motions and relaxations of confined liquids. Science 253, 1374–1379 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klein, J. & Kumacheva, E. Simple liquids confined to molecularly thin layers. I. Confinement-induced liquid to solid phase transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 108, 6996–7009 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rhykerd, C. L., Schoen, M., Diestler, D. J. & Cushman, J. H. Epitaxy in simple classical fluids in micropores and near-solid surfaces. Nature 330, 461–463 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Israelachvili, J., McGuiggan, P. M. & Homola, A. M. Dynamic properties of molecularly thin liquid-films. Science 240, 189–191 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson, P. A., Robbins, M. O. & Grest, G. S. Structure and shear response in nanometer-thick films. Isr. J. Chem. 35, 93–106 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao, J., Luedtke, W. D. & Landman, U. Layering transitions and dynamics of confined liquid films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 705–708 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chandler, D., Weeks, J. D. & Anderson, H. C. Van der Waals picture of liquids, solids and phase transformations. Science 220, 787–794 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tkachenko, A. & Rabin, Y. Effect of boundary conditions in fluctuations and solid-liquid transition in confined films. Langmuir 13, 7146–7150 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinstein, A. & Safran, S. A. Surface and bulk ordering in thin films. Europhys. J. 42, 61–64 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pashley, R. M. Hydration forces between mica surfaces in aqueous electrolyte solutions. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 80, 153–162 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Israelachvili, J. N. & Adams, G. E. Measurement of forces between two mica surfaces in aqueous electrolyte solutions in the range 0–100 nm. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 79, 975–1001 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Happel & Brenner, H. Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1965).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan, D. Y. C. & Horn, R. G. The drainage of thin liquid films between solid surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5311–5324 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pashley, R. M. & Israelachvili, J. N. Molecular layering of water in thin films between mica surfaces and its relation to hydration forces. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 101, 511–523 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Homola, A. M., Israelachvili, J. N., Gee, M. L. & McGuiggan, P. M. Measurements of and relation between the adhesion and friction of two surfaces separated by molecularly thin liquid films. J. Tribol. 111, 675–682 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravina, I. & Low, P. F. Relation between swelling, water properties and b-dimension in montmorillonite-water systems. Clays Clay Minerals 20, 109–123 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cui, S. T., Cummings, P. T. & Cochran, H. D. Molecular simulation of the transition from liquidlike to solidlike behavior in complex fluids confined to nanoscale gaps. J. Chem. Phys. 114, 7189–7195 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berman, A., Drummond, C. & Israelachvili, J. Amontons’ Law at the molecular level. Tribol. Lett. 4, 95–101 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tabor, D. & Winterton, R. H. The direct measurement of normal and retarded van der Waals forces. Proc. R. Soc. A 312, 435–450 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Chandler, J. Israelachvili, S. Safran and S. Titmuss for comments and discussions. We thank the Eshkol Foundation for a studentship (U.R.), and the US–Israel Binational science Foundation, the Deutsche–Israelische Program (DIP) and the Minerva Foundation for their support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Klein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raviv, U., Laurat, P. & Klein, J. Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films. Nature 413, 51–54 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35092523

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35092523

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing