Access

Letters to Nature

Nature 411, 940-944 (21 June 2001) | doi:10.1038/35082058; Received 18 April 2001; Accepted 24 May 2001

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Phylogenetic analyses do not support horizontal gene transfers from bacteria to vertebrates

Michael J. Stanhope, Andrei Lupas, Michael J. Italia, Kristin K. Koretke, Craig Volker & James R. Brown

  1. Bioinformatics, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, UP1345, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, USA

Correspondence to: Michael J. StanhopeJames R. Brown Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.R.B. (e-mail: Email: James_R_Brown@sbphrd.com) or M.J.S. (e-mail: Email: Michael_J_Stanhope@sbphrd.com).

Top

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has long been recognized as a principal force in the evolution of genomes1. Genome sequences of Archaea and Bacteria have revealed the existence of genes whose similarity to loci in distantly related organisms is explained most parsimoniously by HGT events2, 3, 4. In most multicellular organisms, such genetic fixation can occur only in the germ line. Therefore, it is notable that the publication of the human genome reports 113 incidents of direct HGT between bacteria and vertebrates5, without any apparent occurrence in evolutionary intermediates, that is, non-vertebrate eukaryotes. Phylogenetic analysis arguably provides the most objective approach for determining the occurrence and directionality of HGT6, 7. Here we report a phylogenetic analysis of 28 proposed HGT genes, whose presence in the human genome had been confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)5. The results indicate that most putative HGT genes are present in more anciently derived eukaryotes (many such sequences available in non-vertebrate EST databases) and can be explained in terms of descent through common ancestry. They are, therefore, unlikely to be examples of direct HGT from bacteria to vertebrates.