Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 411, 522 (31 May 2001) | doi:10.1038/35079162
Open Innovation Challenges
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Postdoctoral Position Studying Immunology
- The University of Chicago
- Chicago, IL
Research Associate
- University of Glasgow
- Glasgow, UK
erratum: The self-archiving initiative
In Stevan Harnad's Commentary on freeing the scientific literature (Nature 410, 1024–1025; 2001), the estimate of the minimum cost of peer review was not from the American Institute of Physics but from a summary of a group discussion by Mark Doyle of the American Physical Society. The $500 estimate used in that discussion included only peer-review costs, not post-acceptance costs.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
