Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 410, 144 (8 March 2001) | doi:10.1038/35065834
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
-
Optimizing Sub-cellular Localization Tags
The Seeker is looking for methods to optimize sub-cellular localization tags for protein expression....
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Postdoctoral Fellow - Computational Genomics - Team 78 – Ref: 80464
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
- Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1, UK
Basic Science Medical Educators
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
- El Paso, Texas, USA
A question of intent: when is a 'schematic' illustration a fraud?
Michael K. Richardson1 & Gerhard Keuck2
- Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, Kaiserstraat 63, Postbus 9516, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- R&D Documentation, Aventis CropScience GmbH, Industriepark Höchst, K607, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Scientific images are at the centre of recent allegations of 'bad science' (for example, the 'Indonesian coelacanth' story1). How can we identify fraudulent alterations in scientific illustrations?
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
