Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Role of sea surface temperature and soil-moisture feedback in the 1998 Oklahoma–Texas drought

Nature volume 408, pages 842–844 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

The drought that affected the US states of Oklahoma and Texas in the summer of 1998 was strong and persistent, with soil moisture reaching levels comparable to those of the 1930s ‘dust bowl’1,2. Although other effects of the record-strength 1997–98 El Niño were successfully predicted over much of the United States, the Oklahoma–Texas drought was not3. Whereas the response of the tropical atmosphere to strong anomalies in sea surface temperature is quite predictable, the response of the extratropical atmosphere is more variable4,5. Here we present results from mechanistic experiments to clarify the origin and maintenance of this extratropical climate extreme. In addition to global atmospheric models6,7,8,9,10,11, we use a regional model12,13 to isolate regional climate feedbacks. We conclude that during April and May 1998, sea surface temperature anomalies combined with a favourable atmospheric circulation to establish the drought. In June–August, the regional positive feedback associated with lower evaporation and precipitation contributed substantially to the maintenance of the drought. The drought ended in the autumn, when stronger large-scale weather systems were able to penetrate the region and overwhelm the soil-moisture feedback. Our results show the potential for numerical models including appropriate physical processes to make skilful predictions of regional climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparison of observed precipitation and that predicted by the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis.
Figure 2: Comparison of the model impact of SST anomalies (OSST - CSST) with the observed anomalies for May 1998.
Figure 3: Effect of the initial conditions on the drought.
Figure 4: Effect of the soil-moisture feedback on the drought.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basara, J. B., Arndt, D. S., Johnson, H. L., Brotzge, J. G. & Crawford, K. C. An analysis of the drought of 1998 using the Oklahoma Mesonet. Eos 79, 258 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, G. D. et al. Climate assessment for 1998. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80, S1–S48 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnston, A. G. et al. NCEP forecasts of the El Niño of 1997-1998 and its U.S. impacts. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80, 1829–1852 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallace, J. M. et al. On the structure and evolution of ENSO-related climate variability in the tropical Pacific: Lessons from TOGA. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 14241–14259 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, A. & Hoerling, M. Annual cycle of Pacific-North American predictability associated with different phases of ENSO. J. Clim. 11, 3295–3308 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Atlas, R., Wolfson, N. & Terry, J. The effects of SST and soil moisture anomalies on GLA model simulations of the 1988 US summer drought. J. Clim. 6, 2034–2048 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolfson, N., Atlas, R. & Sud, Y. C. Numerical experiments related to the 1980 heat wave. Mon. Weath. Rev. 115, 1345–1357 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mo, K., Zimmerman, J. R., Kalnay, E. & Kanamitsu, M. A GCM study of the 1988 United States drought. Mon. Weath. Rev. 119, 1512–1532 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Trenberth, K. E., Branstator, G. W. & Arkin, P. A. Origins of the 1988 North American drought. Science 242, 1640–1645 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shukla, J. & Mintz, Y. The influence of land-surface evaporation on the earth's climate. Science 215, 1498–1500 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koster, R., Suarez, M. & Heiser, M. Variance and predictability of precipitation at seasonal/to interannual timescales. J. Hydrometeorol. 1, 26–46 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Juang, H.-M. H., Hong, S.-Y. & Kanamitsu, M. The NCEP regional spectral model: An update. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 78, 2125–2143 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roads, J. & Chen, S. Surface water and energy budgets in the NCEP Regional Spectral model. J. Geophys. Res. (in the press).

  14. Ting, M. & Wang, H. Summertime U.S. precipitation variability and its relation to Pacific sea surface temperature. J. Clim. 10, 1853–1873 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Montroy, D. L. Linear relation of central and eastern North American precipitation to tropical Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies. J. Clim. 10, 531–548 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Montroy, D. L., Richman, M. B. & Lamb, P. Observed nonlinearities of monthly teleconnections between tropical Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies and central and eastern North American prediction. J. Clim. 11, 1812–1835 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, P. & Newman, M. Rossby wave propagation and the rapid development of upper-level anomalous anticyclones during the 1988 US drought. J. Clim. 11, 2491–2504 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Caplan, P. et al. Changes to the 1995 NCEP operational medium-range forecast model analysis-forecast system. Weath. Forecast. 12, 581–594 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalnay, E. et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonner, W. D. & Paegle, J. Diurnal variations in the boundary-layer winds over the south central United States in summer. Mon. Weath. Rev. 98, 735–744 (1970)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schubert, S. D., Helfand, H. M., Wu, C.-Y. & Min, W. Subseasonal variations in warm-season moisture transport and precipitation over the central and eastern United States. J. Clim. 11, 2530–2555 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson, J. et al. Present-day capabilities of numerical and statistical models for atmospheric extratropical seasonal simulation and prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80, 1349–1361 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Richman, K. Crawford and J. Basara for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camps Springs, 20746, Maryland, USA

    Song-You Hong

  2. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei University, Shinchon, 134, Seoul, Korea

    Song-You Hong

  3. Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, Maryland, USA

    Eugenia Kalnay

Authors
  1. Song-You Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eugenia Kalnay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugenia Kalnay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, SY., Kalnay, E. Role of sea surface temperature and soil-moisture feedback in the 1998 Oklahoma–Texas drought. Nature 408, 842–844 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35048548

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35048548

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing