Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Psychology

An electoral butterfly effect

Nature volume 408, pages 665–666 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

Part of the controversy surrounding this year's presidential election in the United States concerns the potential for systematic bias in the ballot-card format — could the butterfly ballot used in Palm Beach County, Florida, have led to confusion and caused people who had intended to vote for Al Gore to vote for Pat Buchanan by mistake? Here we show that not only is the double-column butterfly ballot more confusing than a single-column ballot, but that it also appears to cause systematic errors in voting which call into question the validity of the results from Palm Beach County in the 2000 United States presidential election.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The arrangement of candidates on the butterfly ballot in a mock election for the Canadian prime minister.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, P-343 BioSci, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2E9, Alberta, Canada

    Robert C. Sinclair, Sean E. Moore, Carrie A. Lavis & Alexander S. Soldat

  2. Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, Moore Building, University Park, Pennsylvania , 16802, USA

    Melvin M. Mark

Authors
  1. Robert C. Sinclair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melvin M. Mark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sean E. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carrie A. Lavis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexander S. Soldat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Sinclair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinclair, R., Mark, M., Moore, S. et al. An electoral butterfly effect. Nature 408, 665–666 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35047160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35047160

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing