Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes

Abstract

According to the Red Queen hypothesis—which states that interactions among species (such as hosts and parasites) lead to constant natural selection for adaptation and counter-adaptation—the disproportionate evolutionary success of parasites on common host genotypes leads to correlated selection for sexual reproduction1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and local adaptation by the parasite population9,10,11,12,13,14. Here we determined whether local adaptation is due to disproportionate infection of common host genotypes, and, if so, whether infection of common host genotypes is due to commonness per se, or some other aspect of these genotypes. In a reciprocal cross-inoculation experiment parasites occupying the same geographical area (sympatric) infected locally common host genotypes significantly more often than rare host genotypes, whereas parasites occupying separate geographical areas (allopatric) showed no such significant difference. A mixed source of parasites (containing F1 hybrids) also showed no difference in infection between rare and common host genotypes. These results show that local adaptation results from parasite tracking of locally common host genotypes, and, as such, a necessary condition of the Red Queen hypothesis is met.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Experimental infection rates of the two snail populations by sympatric, allopatric and mixed parasites.
Figure 2: Infection rates of Lake Poerua clones that have been common (12, 19, 22, and 63) and rare between 1992 and 1996 by sympatric, allopatric and mixed parasite sources.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaenike, J. An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evol. Theor. 3,191–194 (1978).

  2. Bremermann, H. J. Sex and polymorphism as strategies in host–pathogen interactions. J. Theor. Biol. 87, 671–702 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, W. D. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35, 282–290 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seger, J. & Hamilton, W. D. in The Evolution of Sex (eds Michod, R. E. & Levin, B. R.) 176–193 (Sinauer and Associates, Sunderland, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nee, S. Antagonistic coevolution and the evolution of genotype randomization. J. Theor. Biol. 140, 499–518 ( 1989).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R. & Tanese, R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (A review). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 3566–3573 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Howard, R. S. & Lively, C. M. Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex. Nature 367, 554–557 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters, A. D. & Lively, C. M. The Red Queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat. 154, 393–405 ( 1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Judson, O. P. Preserving genes: a model of the maintenance of genetic variation in a metapopulation under frequency-dependent selection. Genetic. Res. 65, 175–191 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gandon, S., Capoweiz, Y., Dubois, Y., Michalakis, Y. & Olivieri, I. Local adaptation and gene-for-gene coevolution in a metapopulation model. Proc. R. Soc. B 263, 1003–1009 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lively, C. M. Migration, virulence, and the geographic mosaic of adaptation by parasites. Am. Nat. 153, S34–S47 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker, M. Local population differentiation for compatibility in an annual legume and its host-specific fungal pathogen. Evolution 39, 713–723 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lively, C. M. Adaptation by a parasitic trematode to local populations of its host. Evolution 46, 1663–1671 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ebert, D. Virulence and local adaptation of a horizontally transmitted parasite. Science 256, 1084–1086 ( 1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dybdahl, M. D. & Lively, C. M. Diverse, endemic and polyphyletic clones in mixed populations of the freshwater snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum. J. Evol. Biol. 8, 385– 398 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dybdahl, M. F. & Lively, C. M. Host–parasite coevolution: evidence for rare advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population. Evolution 52, 1057– 1066 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dybdahl, M. F. & Lively, C. M. The geography of coevolution: comparative population structures for a snail and its trematode parasite. Evolution 50, 2264– 2275 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Norusis, M. J. SPSS Advanced Statistics User's Guide (SPSS, Chicago, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Delph for helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the US National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Curtis M. Lively or Mark F. Dybdahl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lively, C., Dybdahl, M. Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes. Nature 405, 679–681 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35015069

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35015069

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing