Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 404, 495-498 (30 March 2000) | doi:10.1038/35006635; Received 1 November 1999; Accepted 26 January 2000
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Protect Enzyme from In Planta Degradation
A proposal for stable expression of an enzyme in corn seed is desired.
-
Efficient Chromosome Doubling: Plant Cell Division
The Seeker is looking for an efficient chromosome doubling method in plants and in particular, metho...
nature jobs
Project Managers
- Aurigene Discovery Technologies Limited
- Bangalore, Karnataka 560 100 India
PhD student position
- Laval University Cancer Research Center
- Quebec city, CANADA
The evolution of syntactic communication
Martin A. Nowak1, Joshua B. Plotkin1 & Vincent A. A. Jansen2
- Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA
- School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Surrey, TW20 0EX UK
Correspondence to: Martin A. Nowak1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.A.N. (e-mail: Email: nowak@ias.edu).
Abstract
Animal communication is typically non-syntactic, which means that signals refer to whole situations1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Human language is syntactic, and signals consist of discrete components that have their own meaning8. Syntax is a prerequisite for taking advantage of combinatorics, that is, "making infinite use of finite means"9, 10, 11. The vast expressive power of human language would be impossible without syntax, and the transition from non-syntactic to syntactic communication was an essential step in the evolution of human language12, 13, 14, 15, 16. We aim to understand the evolutionary dynamics of this transition and to analyse how natural selection can guide it. Here we present a model for the population dynamics of language evolution, define the basic reproductive ratio of words and calculate the maximum size of a lexicon. Syntax allows larger repertoires and the possibility to formulate messages that have not been learned beforehand. Nevertheless, according to our model natural selection can only favour the emergence of syntax if the number of required signals exceeds a threshold value. This result might explain why only humans evolved syntactic communication and hence complex language.
- Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA
- School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Surrey, TW20 0EX UK
Correspondence to: Martin A. Nowak1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.A.N. (e-mail: Email: nowak@ias.edu).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).

