Article

Nature 403, 623-627 (10 February 2000) | doi:10.1038/35001009; Received 6 September 1999; Accepted 29 November 1999

A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Peter Uetz1,2, Loic Giot1,3, Gerard Cagney2, Traci A. Mansfield3, Richard S. Judson3, James R. Knight3, Daniel Lockshon2, Vaibhav Narayan3, Maithreyan Srinivasan3, Pascale Pochart3, Alia Qureshi-Emili2,4, Ying Li3, Brian Godwin3, Diana Conover2,4, Theodore Kalbfleisch3, Govindan Vijayadamodar3, Meijia Yang3, Mark Johnston2, Stanley Fields2,4 and Jonathan M. Rothberg3

  1. CuraGen Corporation, 555 Long Wharf Drive, 11th Floor, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  2. Departments of Genetics and Medicine and
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Box 357360, Seattle, Washington 98195-7360, USA
  4. These authors contributed equally to this work
  5. Permanent address: Department of Genetics, Box 8232, Washington University Medical School, 4566 Scott Avenue, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

Correspondence to: Stanley Fields2,4 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.R. (e-mail: Email: jrothberg@curagen.com) and S.F. (e-mail: Email:  fields@u.washington.edu).

Two large-scale yeast two-hybrid screens were undertaken to identify protein–protein interactions between full-length open reading frames predicted from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome sequence. In one approach, we constructed a protein array of about 6,000 yeast transformants, with each transformant expressing one of the open reading frames as a fusion to an activation domain. This array was screened by a simple and automated procedure for 192 yeast proteins, with positive responses identified by their positions in the array. In a second approach, we pooled cells expressing one of about 6,000 activation domain fusions to generate a library. We used a high-throughput screening procedure to screen nearly all of the 6,000 predicted yeast proteins, expressed as Gal4 DNA-binding domain fusion proteins, against the library, and characterized positives by sequence analysis. These approaches resulted in the detection of 957 putative interactions involving 1,004 S. cerevisiae proteins. These data reveal interactions that place functionally unclassified proteins in a biological context, interactions between proteins involved in the same biological function, and interactions that link biological functions together into larger cellular processes. The results of these screens are shown here.

Extra navigation

.

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT