Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Optimizing the success of random searches

Abstract

We address the general question of what is the best statistical strategy to adapt in order to search efficiently for randomly located objects (‘target sites’). It is often assumed in foraging theory that the flight lengths of a forager have a characteristic scale: from this assumption gaussian, Rayleigh and other classical distributions with well-defined variances have arisen. However, such theories cannot explain the long-tailed power-law distributions1,2 of flight lengths or flight times3,4,5,6 that are observed experimentally. Here we study how the search efficiency depends on the probability distribution of flight lengths taken by a forager that can detect target sites only in its limited vicinity. We show that, when the target sites are sparse and can be visited any number of times, an inverse square power-law distribution of flight lengths, corresponding to Lévy flight motion, is an optimal strategy. We test the theory by analysing experimental foraging data on selected insect, mammal and bird species, and find that they are consistent with the predicted inverse square power-law distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Foraging strategy.
Figure 2: a, b, The product of the mean free path λ and the foraging efficiency η against the Lévy parameter μ in one dimension for different values of λ, found from equations (2) and (3) (rv = 1) for the case of non-destructive foraging (a) and from simulations (b).
Figure 3: Foraging by bumble-bees and deer.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsallis,C. Lévy distributions. Phys. World 10, 42–45 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schlesinger,M. F., Zaslavsky,G. M. & Frisch,U. (eds) Lévy Flights and Related Topics in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levandowsky,M., Klafter,J. & White,B. S. Swimming behavior and chemosensory responses in the protistan microzooplankton as a function of the hydrodynamic regime. Bull. Mar. Sci. 43, 758–763 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schuster,F. L. & Levandowsky,M. Chemosensory responses of Acanthamoeba castellani: Visual analysis of random movement and responses to chemical signals. J. Eukaryotic Microbiol. 43, 150–158 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cole,B. J. Fractal time in animal behaviour: The movement activity of Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 50, 1317–1324 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Viswanathan,G. M. et al. Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature 381, 413–415 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shlesinger,M. F. & Klafter,J. in On Growth and Form (eds Stanley, H. E. & Ostrowsky, N.) 279–283 (Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berkolaiko,G., Havlin,S., Larralde,H. & Weiss,G. H. Expected number of distinct sites visited by N discrete Lévy flights on a one-dimensional lattice. Phys. Rev. E 53, 5774–5778 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berkolaiko,G. & Havlin,S. Territory covered by N Lévy flights on d-dimensional lattices. Phys. Rev. E 55, 1395–1400 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Larralde,H., Trunfio,P., Havlin,S., Stanley,H. E. & Weiss,G. H. Territory covered by N diffusing particles. Nature 355, 423–426 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Larralde,H., Trunfio,P., Havlin,S., Stanley,H. E. & Weiss,G. H. Number of distinct sites visited by N random walkers. Phys. Rev. A 4, 7128–7138 (1992).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Szu, H. in Dynamic Patterns in Complex Systems (eds Kelso, J. A. S., Mandell, A. J. & Shlesinger, M. F.) 121–136 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mantegna,R. N. & Stanley,H. E. Stochastic process with ultra-slow convergence to a gaussian: The truncated Lévy flight. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2946–2949 (1994).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Shlesinger,M. F. & Klafter,J. Comment on “Accelerated diffusion in Josephson junctions and related chaotic systems”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2551 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heinrich,B. Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumble-bees. Oecologia 40, 235–245 (1979).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Focardi,S., Marcellini,P. & Montanaro,P. Do ungulates exhibit a food density threshold—a field-study of optimal foraging and movement patterns. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 606–620 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berg,H. C. Random Walks in Biology (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kot,M., Lewis,M. & van der Driessche,P. Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. Ecology 77, 2027–2042 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schulman,L. S. Time's Arrows and Quantum Measurement (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sugihara,G. & May,R. Applications of fractals in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 79–86 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank V. Afanasyev, N. Dokholyan, I. P. Fittipaldi, P. Ch. Ivanov, U. Laino, L. S. Lucena, E. G. Murphy, P. A. Prince, M. F. Shlesinger, B. D. Stosic and P. Trunfio for discussions, and CNPq, NSF and NIH for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. M. Viswanathan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viswanathan, G., Buldyrev, S., Havlin, S. et al. Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature 401, 911–914 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/44831

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/44831

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing