Abstract
Theories of sexual selection assume that predation is a restrictive, simplifying force in the evolution of animal display characters1 and many empirical studies have shown that predation opposes excessive elaboration of sexually selected traits2. In an unexpected turnaround, I show here that predation pressure on neotropical, weakly electric fish (order Gymnotiformes) seems to have selected for greater signal complexity, by favouring characters that have enabled further signal elaboration by sexual selection. Most gymnotiform fish demonstrate adaptations that lower detectability of their electrolocation/communication signals by key predators. A second wave phase added to the ancestral monophasic signal shifts the emitted spectrum above the most sensitive frequencies of electroreceptive predators. By using playback trials with the predatory electric eel (Electrophorus electricus), I show that these biphasic signals are less detectable than the primitive monophasic signals. But sexually mature males of many species in the family Hypopomidae extend the duration of the second phase of their electric signal pulses3 and further amplify this sexual dimorphism nightly during the peak hours of reproduction4. Thus a signal element that evolved for crypsis has itself been modified by sexual selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (Murray, London, (1871).
Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, (1994).
Sullivan, J. P. A Phylogenetic Study of the Neotropical Hypopomid Electric Fishes (Gymnotiformes: Rhamphichthyoidea). Thesis, Duke University(1997).
Franchina, C. R. & Stoddard, P. K. Plasticity of the electric organ discharge waveform of the electric fish Brachyhypopomus pinnicaudatus : I. Quantification of day-night changes. J. Comp. Physiol. A 183, 759–768 (1998).
Lissmann, H. W. On the function and evolution of electric organs in fish. J. Exp. Biol. 35, 156–191 (1958).
Bullock, T. Electroreception. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 121–170 (1982).
Bennett, M. L. V. Modes of operation of electric organs. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 94, 458–509 (1961).
Kirschbaum, F. in Electric Fishes History and Behavior (ed. Moller, P.) 267–301 (Chapman & Hall, London, (1995).
Bennett, M. L. V. in Fish Physiology (eds Hoar, W. S. & Randal, D. J.) 493–574 (Academic, New York, (1971).
Szabo, T. & Fessard, A. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology (ed. Fessard, A.) 59–124 (Springer, Berlin, (1974).
Hagedorn, M. Ecology and behavior of a pulse type electric fish, Hypopomus occidentalis (Gymnotiformes, Hypopomidae), in a fresh water stream in Panama. Copeia 1988, 324–335 (1988).
Westby, G. W. M. The ecology, discharge diversity and predatory behaviour of gymnotiforme electric fish in the coastal streams of French Guiana. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22, 341–354 (1988).
Hopkins, C. D., Comfort, N. C., Bastian, J. & Bass, A. H. Functional analysis of sexual dimorphism in an electric fish, Hypopomus pinnicaudatus, order Gymnotiformes. Brain Behav. Evol. 35, 350–367 (1990).
Shumway, C. A. & Zelick, R. D. Sex recognition and neuronal coding of electric organ discharge waveform in the pulse-type weakly electric fish, Hypopomus occidentalis. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163, 465–478 (1988).
Reid, S. La biologia de los bagres rayados Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum y P. tigrinum en la cuenca del rio Apure – Venezuela. Revista UNELLEZ Ciencia Tecnol. 1, 13–41 (1983).
Dunning, B. B. A quantitative and comparative analysis of the tonic electroreceptors of Gnathonemus, Gymnotus and Kroptypterus. Thesis, University of Minnesota(1973).
McCreery, D. B. Two types of electroreceptive lateral lemniscal neurons of the lateral line lobe of the catfish Ictalurus nebulosus ; connections from the lateral line nerve and steady-state frequency response characteristics. J. Comp. Physiol. 113, 317–339 (1977).
Peters, R. C. & Buwalda, R. J. A. Frequency response of the electroreceptors (“small pit organs”) of the catfish, Ictalurus nebulosus LeS. J. Comp. Physiol. 79, 29–38 (1972).
Hopkins, C. D. & Heiligenberg, W. Evolutionary designs for electric signals and electroreceptors in gymnotoid fishes of Surinam. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3, 113–134 (1978).
Hopkins, C. D. Stimulus filtering and electroreception: tuberous electroreceptors in three species of gymnotiform fish. J. Comp. Physiol. 111, 171–208 (1976).
Moller, P. Electric Fishes History and Behavior (Chapman & Hall, London, (1995).
Alves-Gomes, J. A., Orti, G., Haygood, M., Heiligenberg, W. & Meyer, A. Phylogenetic analysis of the South American electric fishes (order Gymnotiformes) and the evolution of their electrogenic system: a synthesis based on morphology, electrophysiology, and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 298–318 (1995).
Miller, R. R. Geographic distribution of Central American freshwater fishes. Copeia 1966, 773–802 (1966).
Crampton, W. G. R. Electric signal design and habitat preferences in a species rich assemblage of gymnotiform fishes from the upper Amazon basin. An. Acad. Bras. Ci. 70, 805–847 (1998).
Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608 (1964).
Merron, G. S. Pack-hunting in two species of catfish, Clarias gariepinus and C. ngamensis, in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. J. Fish Biol. 43, 575–584 (1993).
Hopkins, C. D. in Electroreception (eds Bullock, T. H. & Heiligenberg, W.) 527–576 (Wiley, New York, (1986).
Sanderford, M. V. & Conner, W. E. Acoustic courtship communication in Syntomeida epilais Wlk. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae, Ctenuchinae). J. Insect Behav. 8, 19–32 (1995).
Simmons, R. B. & Conner, W. E. Ultrasonic signals in the defense and courtship of Euchaetes egle Drury and E. bolteri Stretch (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J. Insect Behav. 9, 909–919 (1996).
Albert, J. S. & Fink, W. L. Sternopygus xingu, a new species of electric fish from Brazil (Teleostei: Gymnotoidei), with comments on the phylogenetic position of Sternopygus. Copeia 1996, 85–102 (1996).
Acknowledgements
M. Olman trained and tested the electric eel, which was provided by H. Zakon. T.Lopez donated its food. F. Torres provided me with live gymnotiforms from Peru, photographed by G.Valcarce. The Organization for Tropical Studies supported field collections with B. Rasnow. J.Alves-Gomes, W. Crampton, W. Heiligenberg, C. Hopkins, J. Sullivan, D. Taphorn and particularly M.Hagedorn contributed helpful insights. T. Collins, K. Condon, G. Read, M. Ryan and J. Trexler improved the manuscript. Support came from the NIH. Experiments complied with NIH ‘Principles of Animal Care’ No. 86-23, rev. 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoddard, P. Predation enhances complexity in the evolution of electric fish signals. Nature 400, 254–256 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/22301
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/22301
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.