Abstract
Aposematic species, which signal conspicuously of their unprofitability to predators, have puzzled evolutionary biologists for over a century1,2. Although conspicuousness of unpalatable prey improves avoidance learning by predators3,4,5, it also involves an evolutionary paradox: with increasing detectability4,6,7,8 the deviant aposematic prey would suffer high predation initially from naive predators. Here we test a neglected idea7,8,9,10,11 that aposematic coloration may evolve by gradual change rather than by major mutations. Weak signals did not suffer high initial predation, but predators (great tits, Parus major) did not learn to separate them from cryptic palatable prey. Furthermore, enhanced avoidance of more conspicuous signals occurred only if predators had previously encountered relatively strong signals. Thus, the gradual-change hypothesis does not provide an easy solution to the initial evolution of aposematism through predator learning. However, the possibility remains that cost-free step-wise mutations over the range of weak signals could accumulate under neutral selection to produce effective strong signals.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wallace, A. R. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 3rd Ser. 3, lxxx–lxxxi (1867).
Schuler, W. & Roper, T. J. Responses to warning coloration in avian predators. Adv. Study Behav. 21, 111–146 (1992).
Gittleman, J. L. & Harvey, P. H. Why are distasteful prey not cryptic? Nature 286, 149–150 (1980).
Guilford, T. in Insect Defences(eds Evans, D. L. & Schmidt, J. O.) 23–61 (State Univ. New York Press, New York, (1990)).
Guilford, T. & Dawkins, M. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim. Behav. 41, 1–14 (1991).
Turner, J. R. G. & Mallet, J. L. B. Did forest islands drive the diversity of warningly coloured butterflies? Biotic drift and the shifting balance. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 835–845 (1996).
Endler, J. A. Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 319, 505–523 (1988).
Endler, J. A. in Behavioural Ecology(eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 163–196 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, (1993)).
Mallet, J. & Singer, M. C. Individual selection, kin selection, and the shifting balance in the evolution of warning colours: the evidence from butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32, 337–350 (1987).
Yachi, S. & Higashi, M. The evolution of warning signals. Nature 394, 882–884 (1998).
Leimar, O., Enquist, M. & Sillén-Tullberg, B. Evolutionary stability of aposematic coloration and prey unprofitability: a theoretical analysis. Am. Nat. 128, 469–490 (1986).
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection(Clarendon, Oxford, (1930)).
Alatalo, R. V. & Mappes, J. Tracking the evolution of warning signals. Nature 382, 708–710 (1996).
Guilford, T. Is kin selection involved in the evolution of warning coloration? Oikos 45, 31–36 (1985).
Coppinger, R. P. The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies I. Reactions of wild-caught adult blue jays to novel insects. Behaviour 35, 45–60 (1969).
Coppinger, R. P. The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects. Am. Nat. 104, 323–335 (1970).
Hanson, H. M. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 321–334 (1959).
Leimar, O. & Tuomi, J. Synergistic selection and graded traits. Evol. Ecol. 12, 59–71 (1998).
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Rowe and T. Guilford for insightful discussions; J. A. Endler, V. Kaitala, E. Koskela, K. Kärkkäinen, A. Lyytinen, T. Mappes and S. Parri for help in clarifying the manuscript; and the Konnevesi Research Station, Helinä Nisu and ‘the academic hobby crafts club’ for immense help. The study was supported by the Academy of Finland. Authors after senior author are in alphabetical order.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindström, L., Alatalo, R., Mappes, J. et al. Can aposematic signals evolve by gradual change?. Nature 397, 249–251 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/16692
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/16692
This article is cited by
-
An evolutionary route to warning coloration
Nature (2023)
-
Linking Predator Responses to Alkaloid Variability in Poison Frogs
Journal of Chemical Ecology (2023)
-
The molecular basis and evolution of toxin resistance in poison frogs
Evolutionary Ecology (2023)
-
Effects of predator associative learning and innate aversion on mimicry complexes
Evolutionary Ecology (2023)
-
Experimental evidence in a poison frog model suggests that tadpole transport on the dorsum may affects warning signal effectiveness in poison frogs
Evolutionary Ecology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
