Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Navigation through vector addition

Abstract

During short foraging excursions away from their home, central place foragers update their position relative to their point of departure by processing signals generated by locomotion. They therefore can home along a self-generated vector without using learned references. In rodents1,2,3,4,5 and other mammals6,7, this path integration process (dead reckoning) can occur on the basis of purely internal signals, such as vestibular8 or proprioceptive (re)afferences6. We report here that hamsters are also capable of proceeding to a previously learned feeding site through vector information from locomotion only. The subjects compute9 the direction and distance to the goal by subtracting their current-position vector from the stored nest-to-goal vector. This computation pertains to locations per se and therefore occurs in absolute space, independently of landmark objects. If available, prominent visual cues merely serve to confirm the path planned through the addition of self-generated vectors, whereas visual as well as non-visual references confirm that the subject has arrived at the goal site.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Apparatus.
Figure 2: The autonomous paths followed by individual subjects in experiment Light.
Figure 3: The autonomous paths followed by individual subjects in experiment Dark.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alyan, S. & Jander, R. Short-range homing in the house mouse, Mus musculus: Stages in the learning of directions. Anim. Behav. 48, 285–298 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benhamou, S. Path integration by swimming rats. Anim. Behav. 54, 321–327 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Etienne, A. S. Navigation of a small mammal by dead reckoning and local cues. Curr. Dir. Psych. Sci. 1, 48–52 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mittelstaedt, H. & Mittelstaedt, M. L. in Avian Navigation (eds Papi, F. & Wallraff, H. G.) 290–297 (Springer, Berlin, 1982).

  5. Potegal, M. in Cognitive Processes and Spatial Orientation in Animal and Man Vol. 2 (eds Ellen, P. & Thinus-Blanc, C.) 28–34 (M. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, (1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Etienne, A. S., Maurer, R. & Séguinot, V. Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 201–209 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Séguinot, V., Cattet, J. & Benhamou, S. Path integration in dogs. Anim. Behav. 55, 787–979 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiener, S. & Berthoz, A. in Multisensory Control of Movement (ed. Berthoz, A.) 427–456 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maurer, R. & Séguinot, V. What is modelling for? A critical review of the models of path integration. J. Theor. Biol. 175, 457–475 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallistel, C. R. The Organization of Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Etienne, A. S., Maurer, R. & Saucy, F. Limitations in the assessment of path dependent information. Behaviour 106, 81–111 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collett, T. S., Cartwright, B. A. & Smith, B. A. Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils. J. Comp. Physiol A 158, 835–851 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Etienne, A. S., Vauclair, J., Emmanuelli, E., Lançon, M. & Stryjenski, J. Depth perception by means of ambient sounds in a small mammal. Experientia 38, 553–555 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Séguinot, V., Maurer, R. & Etienne, A. S. Dead reckoning in a small mammal: the evaluation of distance. J. Comp. Physiol. A 173, 103–113 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng, K. The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. J. Exp. Psychol., Anim. Behav. Proc. 15, 366–375 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McNaughton, B. L., Chen, L. L. & Markus, E. J. “Dead reckoning”, landmark learning, and the sense of direction: a neurophysiological and computational hypothesis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 3, 190–202 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alyan, S. & Jander, R. Interplay of directional navigation mechanisms as a function of near-goal distance: experiments with the house mouse. Behav. Proc. 41, 245–255 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. We thank A.Kfouri for his suggestions and R. Schumacher for his technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. S. Etienne or R. Maurer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Etienne, A., Maurer, R., Berlie, J. et al. Navigation through vector addition. Nature 396, 161–164 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/24151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/24151

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing