Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Sun's shape and brightness

Abstract

The origin of the 11- and 22-year solar cycles remains one of the more mysterious aspects of the Sun. These cycles are probably driven by convection in the solar interior, but the convection zone is difficult to probe. Small departures from sphericity in the effective surface temperature of the Sun can in principle be used in this regard. Such variations, which are observed as changes in the surface brightness with solar latitude, may be caused by differences between the vertical and horizontal turbulent convective flows1 inside the Sun. Moreover, variations in the Sun's luminosity may be related to changes in conditions near the base of the convection zone2 that result from the magnetic (sunspot) cycle3. Here we present satellite data that show that the Sun's shape and temperature vary with latitude in an unexpectedly complex way. Although the solar oblateness shows no evidence of varying with the solar cycle, we find a significant hexadecapole shape term which may vary. We also see a variation of about 1.5 K in the surface temperature with latitude. Based on these results, we suggest that sensitive observations of brightness variations be used as a record of the surface ‘shadow’ of cyclical changes in the solar interior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Limb displacement, S(θ), for each of the 512 angular bins around the Sun, as derived from 1997 measurements.
Figure 2: The modern oblateness measurements versus time.
Figure 3: The effective limb temperature change versus position angle, θ, in 1997 is plotted here.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Durney, B. R. & Roxburgh, I. Homogeneous convection and the equatorial acceleration. Sol. Phys. 16, 2–20 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhn, J. R. The Structure of the Sun: VI. Winter School at IAC (eds Roca Cortes, T. & Sanchez, F.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhn, J. R., Libbrecht, K. G. & Dicke, R. H. The surface temperature of the Sun and changes in the solar constant. Science 242, 908–911 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schur, W. & Ambronn, L. Messungen des Sonnendurchmessers. Astron. Mit. Koniglichen Stern. Zu Göttingen 1–126 ((1905)).

  5. Dicke, R. H. & Goldenberg, H. M. Solar oblateness and general relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 313–316 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill, H. A. & Stebbins, R. T. The intrinsic visual oblateness of the Sun. Astrophys. J. 200, 471–483 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dicke, R. H., Kuhn, J. R. & Libbrecht, K. G. Is the solar oblateness variable? Astrophys. J. 318, 471–483 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beardsley, B. The Visual Shape and Multipole Moments of the Sun.Thesis, Univ. Arizona((1987)).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rösch, J., Rozelot, J. P., Deslandes, H. & Desnoux, V. Anew estimate of the quadrupole moment of the Sun. Solar Phys. 165, 1–11 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lydon, T. J. & Sofia, S. Ameasurement of the shape of the solar disk. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 177–179 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rozelot, J. P. & Rösch, J. An upper bound to the solar oblateness. Solar Phys. 172, 11–18 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scherrer, P. H. et al. The Solar Oscillations Investigation—Michelson Doppler Imager: The SOHO Mission (eds Fleck, B., Domingo, V. & Polland, A.) (Kluwer, Holland, (1995)).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhn, J. R. et al. Sounding Solar and Stellar Interiors (ed. Berthomieu, G.) (Kluwer, Holland, (1997)).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lites, B. The extreme limb of the Sun. Sol. Phys. 85, 193–210 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn, J. R., Lin, H. & Loranz, D. Gain calibrating nonuniform image-array data using only the image data. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 103, 1097–1108 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Saba, C. DeForest and J. Covington for their assistance in operating the MDI instrument; L. Allen, H. Schweitzer, J.-P. Olive and K. Miller for the planning and execution of SOHO roll manoeuvrers; and the SOHO flight operations team, including H. Benefield, N. Piston and B.Sapper, for making these activities run flawlessly. This work was supported by NASA. We dedicate this work to the memory of Robert H. Dicke, who inspired a generation of astrophysicists to consider the measurement and interpretation of the shape of the Sun.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Kuhn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuhn, J., Bush, R., Scheick, X. et al. The Sun's shape and brightness. Nature 392, 155–157 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/32361

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/32361

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing