Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Detection of intergalactic red-giant-branch stars in the Virgo cluster

Abstract

It has been suspected for nearly 50 years that galaxy clusters contain a population of intergalactic stars ripped from the galaxies during cluster formation, or when the galactic orbits pass through the cluster centre1,2,3. Observational support for theexistence of such a stellar population is provided both by measurements of the diffuse light in clusters4,5,6,7,8,9, and by the recent detection of planetary nebulae with positions or velocities far removed from any observable cluster galaxy10,11. But estimates for the mass of the diffuse population and its distribution relative to the cluster galaxies are still highly uncertain. Here we report the direct detection of intergalactic stars in deep images of a blank field in the Virgo cluster. The data suggest that these stars form approximately one-tenth of the total stellar mass of the cluster. We observe a relatively homogeneous distribution of stars, with evidence of a slight gradient towards M87.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The ‘X’ marks the position of the HST images in this view of the core of the Virgo cluster.
Figure 2: Comparison of source counts in the Virgo cluster field and the Hubble Deep Field (HDF).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zwicky, F. The Coma cluster of galaxies. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 63, 61–71 (1951).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Merritt, D. Relaxation and tidal stripping in rich clusters of galaxies. ii — Evolution of the luminosity distribution. Astrophys. J. 276, 26–37 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, B., Katz, N., Lake, G., Dressler, A. & Oemler, A. J. Galaxy harassment and the evolution of clusters of galaxies. Nature 379, 613–616 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Vaucouleurs, G. The apparent density of matter in groups and clusters of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 131, 585–597 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gunn, J. E. Visual background radiation in the Coma cluster of galaxies. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 1, 191 (1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thuan, T. X. & Kormendy, J. Photographic measurements of diffuse light in the Coma cluster. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 89, 466–473 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uson, J.et al. Diffuse light in dense clusters of galaxies. i — R-band observations of Abell 2029. Astrophys. J. 369, 46–53 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vilchez-Gomez, R.et al. Detection of intracluster light in the rich clusters of galaxies Abell 2390 and cl1613+31. Astron. Astrophys. 283, 37–50 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheick, X. & Kuhn, J. R. Diffuse light in A2670: Smoothly distributed? Astrophys. J. 423, 566–580 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnaboldi, M.et al. The kinematics of the planetary nebulae in the outer regions of NGC 4406. Astrophys. J. 472, 145–152 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Theuns, T. & Warren, S. J. Intergalactic stars in the Fornax cluster. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 284, L11–L15 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, G. E. Effects of galaxy collisions on the structure and evolution of galaxy. Astrophys. J. 268, 495–512 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, B., Katz, N. & Lake, G. On the destruction and overmerging of dark halos in dissipationless n-body simulations. Astrophys. J. 457, 455–459 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peebles, P. J. E. Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects vi. The galaxy distribution in the jagellonian field. Astrophys. J. 196, 647–652 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brainerd, T. G., Smail, I. & Mould, J. The evolution in clustering of galaxies to R = 26. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 275, 781–789 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Fagotto, G. & Nasi, E. Theoretical isochrones from models with new radiative opacities. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 106, 275–302 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakai, S.et al. Detection of the tip of the red giant branch in NGC 3379 (M105) in the Leo I group using the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 478, 49–57 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Capaccioli, M., Held, E. V., Lorenz, H. & Vietri, M. Photographic and CCD surface photometry of the standard elliptical galaxy NGC3379. Astron. J. 99, 1813–1822 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanvir, N. R., Shanks, T., Ferguson, H. C. & Robinson, D. R. T. Determination of the Hubble constant from observations of cepheid variables in the galaxy M96. Nature 377, 27–31 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tully, R. B. & Shaya, E. J. Infall of galaxies into the Virgo cluster and some cosmological constraints. Astrophys. J. 281, 31–55 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Binggeli, B., Sandage, A. & Tammann, G. A. Studies of the Virgo cluster. ii — a catalog of 2096 galaxies in the Virgo cluster area. Astron. J. 90, 1681–1771 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Caon, N., Capaccioli, M. & Rampazzo, R. Photographic and CCD surface photometry of 33 early-type galaxies in the Virgo cluster. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 86, 429–471 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Freedman, W. L.et al. Distance to the Virgo cluster galaxy M100 from Hubble Space Telescope observations of cepheids. Nature 371, 757–762 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sandage, A. & Tammann, G. An alternative calculation of the distance to M87 using the Whitmore et al. luminosity function for its globular clusters: H0 therefrom. Astrophys. J. 464, L51–L54 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nulsen, P. E. J. & Böhringer, H. ARosat determination of the mass of the central Virgo cluster. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 274, 1093–1106 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, M. G., Freedman, W. L. & Madore, B. F. Astrophys. J. 417, 553–559 (1993).

  27. Soria, R.et al. Detection of the tip of the red giant branch in NGC5128. Astrophys. J. 465, 79–90 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Holtzman, J. A.et al. The photometric performance and calibration of WFPC2. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 107, 1065–1093 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill, R. J.et al. The extragalaxtic distance scale key project. V. Photometry of the brightest stars in M100 and the calibration of WFPC2. Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  30. Burstein, D. & Heiles, C. Reddening estimates for galaxies in the second reference catalog and the Uppsala general catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 54, 33–79 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams, R. E.et al. The Hubble deep field: Observations, data reduction, and galaxy photometry. Astron. J. 112, 1335–1389 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Salpeter, E. E. The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161–167 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stetson, P. B. DAOPHOT-A computer program for crowded-field stellar photometry. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 99, 191–222 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Sakai, R. Soria and C. Grillmair for providing stellar photometry from nearby galaxies for comparison to the Virgo Cluster data; M. Dickinson for the use of the 3C210 comparison field; to A. Fruchter and R. Hook for use of the ‘drizzle’ code; V. Rubin, F. Schweizer and A.Saha for discussions; and the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism for hospitality (T.v.H.). T.v.H. was partially supported by the Edgar P. and Nona B. McKinney Charitable Trust. This work was also supported by NASA through a General Observer research grant awarded by Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry C. Ferguson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, H., Tanvir, N. & von Hippel, T. Detection of intergalactic red-giant-branch stars in the Virgo cluster. Nature 391, 461–463 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/35087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35087

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing