Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution

Abstract

DNA shuffling is a powerful process for directed evolution, which generates diversity by recombination1,2, combining useful mutations from individual genes. Libraries of chimaeric genes can be generated by random fragmentation of a pool of related genes, followed by reassembly of the fragments in a self-priming polymerase reaction. Template switching causes crossovers in areas of sequence homology. Our previous studies used single genes and random point mutations as the source of diversity3,4,5,6. An alternative source of diversity is naturally occurring homologous genes, which provide ‘functional diversity’. To evaluate whether natural diversity could accelerate the evolution process, we compared the efficiency of obtaining moxalactamase activity from four cephalosporinase genes evolved separately with that from a mixed pool of the four genes. A single cycle of shuffling yielded eightfold improvements from the four separately evolved genes, versus a 270- to 540-fold improvement from the four genes shuffled together, a 50-fold increase per cycle of shuffling. The best clone contained eight segments from three of the four genes as well as 33 amino-acid point mutations. Molecular breeding by shuffling can efficiently mix sequences from different species, unlike traditional breeding techniques. The power of family shuffling may arise from sparse sampling of a larger portion of sequence space.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Phylogenetic tree of the four cephalosporinase genes.
Figure 2: a, Comparison of single sequence shuffling versus sequence family shuffling.
Figure 3: Computer model of evolved mutant A obtained by a single cycle of family shuffling.
Figure 4: Searching sequence space by family shuffling versus by single sequence shuffling.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stemmer, W. P. C. DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10747–10751 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stemmer, W. P. C. Searching sequence space. Bio/Technology 13, 549–553 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stemmer, W. P. C. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 370, 389–391 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, J., Dawes, G. & Stemmer, W. P. C. Evolution of a fucosidase from a galactosidase by DNA shuffling and screening. Proc. Natl Acac. Sci. USA 94, 4504–4509 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Crameri, A., Whitehorn, E., Tate, E. & Stemmer, W. P. C. Improved green fluorescent protein by molecular evolution using DNA shuffling. Nature Biotech. 14, 315–319 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crameri, A., Dawes, G., Rodriguez, E., Silver, S. & Stemmer, W. P. C. Molecular Evolution of an arsenate detoxification pathway by DNA shuffling. Nature Biotech. 15, 436–438 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore, J. C. & Arnold, F. H. Directed evolution of a para-nitrobenzyl esterase for aqueous-organic solvents. Nature Biotech. 14, 458–467 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, H. & Arnold, F. H. Optimization of DNA shuffling for high fidelity recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 1307–1308 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindberg, F. & Normark, S. Sequence of the Citrobacter freundii OS60 chromosomal ampC β-lactamase gene. Eur. J. Biochem. 156, 441–445 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Galleni, M. et al. Sequence and comparative analysis of three Enterobacter cloacae ampC β-lactamase genes and their products. Biochem. J. 250, 753–760 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leiza, M. G. et al. Gene sequence and biochemical characterization of FOX-1 from Klebsiella pneumoniae, a new AmpC-type plasmid-mediated β-lactamase with two molecular variants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38, 2150–2157 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seoane, A., Francia, M. V. & Garcia Lobo, J. M. Nucleotide sequence of the ampC-ampR region from the chromosome of Yersinia enterocolitica. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36, 1049–1052 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stemmer, W. P. C., Crameri, A., Ha, K. D., Brennan, T. M. & Heyneker, H. L. Single-step PCR assembly of a gene and a whole plasmid from large numbers of oligonucleotides. Gene 164, 49–53 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lobkovsky, E. et al. Evolution of enzyme activity: crystallographic structure at 2 Å resolution of cephalosporinase from the ampC gene of Enterobacter cloacae P99 and comparison with a class A penicillinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 11257–11261 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kauffman, S. The Origins of Order (Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1993)).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eigen, M. Steps Towards Life: a Perspective on Evolution (Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1992)).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Dawes, J. Kieft, S. DelCardayre and M. Tobin and R. Howard, C.Yanofsky, P. Schultz, F. Arnold and A. Kornberg for useful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willem P. C. Stemmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crameri, A., Raillard, SA., Bermudez, E. et al. DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution. Nature 391, 288–291 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/34663

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/34663

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing